[PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9132 CEX-7 evaluation board

[Josua Mayer]

Am 09.05.24 um 18:00 schrieb Conor Dooley:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> Am 09.05.24 um 12:46 schrieb Josua Mayer:
>>> Add bindings for the SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 evaluation board.
>>> The CEX is based on CN9130 SoC and includes two southbridges.
>>>
>>> Because CN9132 and 9131 are just names for different designs around the
>>> same SoC, no soc compatibles beside marvell,cn9130 are needed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua at solid-run.com>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
>>> index 74d935ea279c..538d91be8857 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
>>> @@ -92,4 +92,12 @@ properties:
>>>            - const: solidrun,cn9130-sr-som
>>>            - const: marvell,cn9130
>>>  
>>> +      - description:
>>> +          SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 based single-board computers
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - solidrun,cn9132-clearfog
>>> +          - const: solidrun,cn9132-sr-cex7
>>> +          - const: marvell,cn9130
>>> +
>>>  additionalProperties: true
>>>
>> It appears I will not be able to submit actual device-tree for this
>> board. Therefore when applying this patch-set, it may be skipped.
>>
>> I am not sure about the policy in this case,
>> if it is better to pick or skip.
> What do you mean my "not be able to"?
I may not be able to do it in time for closing of merge window.
> Does the device exist?
Yes, it exists, and we have a (low quality) downstream dts.
> If it does
> then, I at least, have no objection to documenting a compatible for it.
Great, in this case please keep it, thanks!