[PATCH v9 2/5] remoteproc: k3-m4: Add a remoteproc driver for M4F subsystem
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Thu May 9 08:32:00 PDT 2024
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 10:54, Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/24 3:36 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:18:08PM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> >> From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch at collabora.com>
> >>
> >> The AM62x and AM64x SoCs of the TI K3 family has a Cortex M4F core in
> >> the MCU domain. This core is typically used for safety applications in a
> >> stand alone mode. However, some application (non safety related) may
> >> want to use the M4F core as a generic remote processor with IPC to the
> >> host processor. The M4F core has internal IRAM and DRAM memories and are
> >> exposed to the system bus for code and data loading.
> >>
> >> A remote processor driver is added to support this subsystem, including
> >> being able to load and boot the M4F core. Loading includes to M4F
> >> internal memories and predefined external code/data memories. The
> >> carve outs for external contiguous memory is defined in the M4F device
> >> node and should match with the external memory declarations in the M4F
> >> image binary. The M4F subsystem has two resets. One reset is for the
> >> entire subsystem i.e including the internal memories and the other, a
> >> local reset is only for the M4F processing core. When loading the image,
> >> the driver first releases the subsystem reset, loads the firmware image
> >> and then releases the local reset to let the M4F processing core run.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch at collabora.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 13 +
> >> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 785 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 799 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> >> index 48845dc8fa852..1a7c0330c91a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> >> @@ -339,6 +339,19 @@ config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC
> >> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> >> the DSP slave processors.
> >>
> >> +config TI_K3_M4_REMOTEPROC
> >> + tristate "TI K3 M4 remoteproc support"
> >> + depends on ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
> >> + select MAILBOX
> >> + select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
> >> + help
> >> + Say m here to support TI's M4 remote processor subsystems
> >> + on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote processor
> >> + framework.
> >> +
> >> + It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> >> + a remote processor.
> >> +
> >> config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
> >> tristate "TI K3 R5 remoteproc support"
> >> depends on ARCH_K3
> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> >> index 91314a9b43cef..5ff4e2fee4abd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> >> @@ -37,5 +37,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_M4_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000000..0030e509f6b5d
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,785 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +/*
> >> + * TI K3 Cortex-M4 Remote Processor(s) driver
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2021-2024 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
> >> + * Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/io.h>
> >> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> >> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> >> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> >> +
> >> +#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
> >> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> >> +#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct k3_m4_rproc_mem - internal memory structure
> >> + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> >> + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region
> >> + * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from remote processor view
> >> + * @size: Size of the memory region
> >> + */
> >> +struct k3_m4_rproc_mem {
> >> + void __iomem *cpu_addr;
> >> + phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> >> + u32 dev_addr;
> >> + size_t size;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data - memory definitions for a remote processor
> >> + * @name: name for this memory entry
> >> + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
> >> + */
> >> +struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
> >> + const char *name;
> >> + const u32 dev_addr;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct k3_m4_rproc_dev_data - device data structure for a remote processor
> >> + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a remote processor
> >> + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
> >> + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
> >> + */
> >> +struct k3_m4_rproc_dev_data {
> >> + const struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data *mems;
> >> + u32 num_mems;
> >> + bool uses_lreset;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct k3_m4_rproc - k3 remote processor driver structure
> >> + * @dev: cached device pointer
> >> + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle
> >> + * @mem: internal memory regions data
> >> + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions
> >> + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
> >> + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
> >> + * @reset: reset control handle
> >> + * @data: pointer to device data
> >> + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
> >> + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
> >> + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> >> + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
> >> + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
> >> + */
> >> +struct k3_m4_rproc {
> >> + struct device *dev;
> >> + struct rproc *rproc;
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc_mem *mem;
> >> + int num_mems;
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc_mem *rmem;
> >> + int num_rmems;
> >> + struct reset_control *reset;
> >> + const struct k3_m4_rproc_dev_data *data;
> >> + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> >> + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> >> + u32 ti_sci_id;
> >> + struct mbox_chan *mbox;
> >> + struct mbox_client client;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * k3_m4_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler
> >> + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel
> >> + * @data: mailbox payload
> >> + *
> >> + * This handler is invoked by the K3 mailbox driver whenever a mailbox
> >> + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains
> >> + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor,
> >> + * and we let remoteproc core handle it.
> >> + *
> >> + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values
> >> + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very
> >> + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices.
> >> + */
> >> +static void k3_m4_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_m4_rproc,
> >> + client);
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent;
> >> + const char *name = kproc->rproc->name;
> >> + u32 msg = (u32)(uintptr_t)(data);
> >> +
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
> >> +
> >> + switch (msg) {
> >> + case RP_MBOX_CRASH:
> >> + /*
> >> + * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not
> >> + * supported. So, just log this for now
> >> + */
> >> + dev_err(dev, "K3 rproc %s crashed\n", name);
> >> + break;
> >> + case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY:
> >> + dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name);
> >> + break;
> >> + default:
> >> + /* silently handle all other valid messages */
> >> + if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG)
> >> + return;
> >> + if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) {
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg);
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> + /* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */
> >> + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE)
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg);
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages.
> >> + * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed
> >> + * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register),
> >> + * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues.
> >> + */
> >> +static void k3_m4_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> >> + u32 msg = (u32)vqid;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */
> >> + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)(uintptr_t)msg);
> >
> > I remember discussing this but can't recall the outcome. Still, I don't see
> > why (uintptr_t) is needed here.
> >
>
> Was discussed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/3/28/974
>
> Re-quoting my response from last time:
>
> > Doing that in one step (u32 -> void*) causes a warning when void* is 64bit
> > (cast from int to pointer of different size).
>
I remember now - please add a comment that supports using the syntax.
That way we avoid receiving patches and once again having to review
this.
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n",
> >> + ret);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/* Put the remote processor into reset */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_reset(struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> >> + kproc->ti_sci_id);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> >> + if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset))
> >> + dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n");
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/* Release the remote processor from reset */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_release(struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
> >> + goto lreset;
> >> +
> >> + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> >> + kproc->ti_sci_id);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> +lreset:
> >> + ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> >> + if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> >> + kproc->ti_sci_id))
> >
> > This is done unconditionally, even when dev_ops.get_device() above hasn't been
> > called.
> >
>
> Will rework to fix that, seems this is also a problem for ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> from which this function was based. Will fix that too when we factor out these
> common functions.
>
> >> + dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + client->dev = dev;
> >> + client->tx_done = NULL;
> >> + client->rx_callback = k3_m4_rproc_mbox_callback;
> >> + client->tx_block = false;
> >> + client->knows_txdone = false;
> >> +
> >> + kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
> >> + ret = -EBUSY;
> >> + dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
> >> + PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> >> + * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
> >> + *
> >> + * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
> >> + * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
> >> + */
> >> + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
> >> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * The M4 cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
> >> + * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the internal
> >> + * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is
> >> + * used to release the global reset on remote cores to allow loading into the
> >> + * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any
> >> + * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to
> >> + * actually let the remote cores to run. This callback is invoked only in
> >> + * remoteproc mode.
> >> + */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> >> + kproc->ti_sci_id);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n",
> >> + ret);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary
> >> + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the
> >> + * global reset on applicable cores. This completes the second portion of
> >> + * powering down the remote core. The cores themselves are only halted in the
> >> + * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked
> >> + * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global
> >> + * reset. This callback is invoked only in remoteproc mode.
> >> + */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> >> + kproc->ti_sci_id);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * This function implements the .get_loaded_rsc_table() callback and is used
> >> + * to provide the resource table for a booted remote processor in IPC-only
> >> + * mode. The remote processor firmwares follow a design-by-contract approach
> >> + * and are expected to have the resource table at the base of the DDR region
> >> + * reserved for firmware usage. This provides flexibility for the remote
> >> + * processor to be booted by different bootloaders that may or may not have the
> >> + * ability to publish the resource table address and size through a DT
> >> + * property.
> >> + */
> >> +static struct resource_table *k3_m4_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> >> + size_t *rsc_table_sz)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> +
> >> + if (!kproc->rmem[0].cpu_addr) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "memory-region #1 does not exist, loaded rsc table can't be found");
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * NOTE: The resource table size is currently hard-coded to a maximum
> >> + * of 256 bytes. The most common resource table usage for K3 firmwares
> >> + * is to only have the vdev resource entry and an optional trace entry.
> >> + * The exact size could be computed based on resource table address, but
> >> + * the hard-coded value suffices to support the IPC-only mode.
> >> + */
> >> + *rsc_table_sz = 256;
> >> + return (__force struct resource_table *)kproc->rmem[0].cpu_addr;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Custom function to translate a remote processor device address (internal
> >> + * RAMs only) to a kernel virtual address. The remote processors can access
> >> + * their RAMs at either an internal address visible only from a remote
> >> + * processor, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these addresses need to be
> >> + * looked through for translation. The translated addresses can be used either
> >> + * by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel remoteproc loader), or
> >> + * by any rpmsg bus drivers.
> >> + */
> >> +static void *k3_m4_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iomem)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + void __iomem *va = NULL;
> >> + phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> >> + u32 dev_addr, offset;
> >> + size_t size;
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + if (len == 0)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) {
> >> + bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr;
> >> + dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr;
> >> + size = kproc->mem[i].size;
> >> +
> >> + /* handle M4-view addresses */
> >> + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
> >> + offset = da - dev_addr;
> >> + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> >> + return (__force void *)va;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* handle SoC-view addresses */
> >> + if (da >= bus_addr && ((da + len) <= (bus_addr + size))) {
> >> + offset = da - bus_addr;
> >> + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> >> + return (__force void *)va;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) {
> >> + dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr;
> >> + size = kproc->rmem[i].size;
> >> +
> >> + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
> >> + offset = da - dev_addr;
> >> + va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> >> + return (__force void *)va;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc)
> >> +{
> >> + const struct k3_m4_rproc_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
> >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> + struct resource *res;
> >> + int num_mems = 0;
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
> >> + kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems,
> >> + sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!kproc->mem)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
> >> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> + data->mems[i].name);
> >> + if (!res) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
> >> + data->mems[i].name);
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> >> + resource_size(res),
> >> + dev_name(dev))) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
> >> + data->mems[i].name);
> >> + return -EBUSY;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
> >> + resource_size(res));
> >> + if (!kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
> >> + data->mems[i].name);
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> >> + kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> >> + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
> >> + kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
> >> +
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> >> + data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> >
> > I'm pretty sure you are intrested in kproc->mem[i].bus_addr rather than
> > &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr.
> >
>
> I think this is correct as it is, the %pa format takes a "reference" to what
> we are interested in, so we need to pass the address of the address :)
>
You are correct.
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
>
> >> + kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
> >> + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
> >> + }
> >> + kproc->num_mems = num_mems;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void k3_m4_rproc_dev_mem_release(void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = data;
> >> +
> >> + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int k3_m4_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> >> + struct device_node *rmem_np;
> >> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> >> + int num_rmems;
> >> + int ret, i;
> >> +
> >> + num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> >> + sizeof(phandle));
> >> + if (num_rmems < 0) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions (%pe)\n",
> >> + ERR_PTR(num_rmems));
> >
> > Why use %pe and ERR_PTR() when function of_property_count_elems_of_size()
> > returns a simple error code?
> >
>
> Done to match the same in ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c but I see no good reason
> for it, will fix.
>
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> + if (num_rmems < 2) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "device needs at least two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n",
> >> + num_rmems);
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */
> >> + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool (%pe)\n",
> >> + ERR_PTR(ret));
> >
> > Same
> >
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, k3_m4_rproc_dev_mem_release, dev);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + num_rmems--;
> >> + kproc->rmem = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!kproc->rmem)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + /* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) {
> >> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1);
> >> + if (!rmem_np)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> >> + if (!rmem) {
> >> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> >> +
> >> + kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base;
> >> + /* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */
> >> + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base;
> >> + kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size;
> >> + kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rmem->base, rmem->size);
> >> + if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n",
> >> + i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> >> + i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr,
> >> + kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr,
> >> + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr);
> >> + }
> >> + kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct ti_sci_proc *k3_m4_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
> >> + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> >> + u32 temp[2];
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids",
> >> + temp, 2);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >> +
> >> + tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!tsp)
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >> +
> >> + tsp->dev = dev;
> >> + tsp->sci = sci;
> >> + tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
> >> + tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
> >> + tsp->host_id = temp[1];
> >> +
> >> + return tsp;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void k3_m4_release_tsp(void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp = data;
> >> +
> >> + ti_sci_proc_release(tsp);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Power up the M4F remote processor.
> >> + *
> >> + * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc
> >> + * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements
> >> + * were met. This callback is invoked only in remoteproc mode.
> >> + */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = k3_m4_rproc_release(kproc);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto put_mbox;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> +put_mbox:
> >> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Stop the M4 remote processor.
> >> + *
> >> + * This function puts the M4 processor into reset, and finishes processing
> >> + * of any pending messages. This callback is invoked only in remoteproc mode.
> >> + */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> +
> >> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> >> +
> >> + k3_m4_rproc_reset(kproc);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Attach to a running M4 remote processor (IPC-only mode)
> >> + *
> >> + * This rproc attach callback only needs to request the mailbox, the remote
> >> + * processor is already booted, so there is no need to issue any TI-SCI
> >> + * commands to boot the M4 core. This callback is used only in IPC-only mode.
> >> + */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + dev_info(dev, "M4 initialized in IPC-only mode\n");
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Detach from a running M4 remote processor (IPC-only mode)
> >> + *
> >> + * This rproc detach callback performs the opposite operation to attach callback
> >> + * and only needs to release the mailbox, the M4 core is not stopped and will
> >> + * be left to continue to run its booted firmware. This callback is invoked only in
> >> + * IPC-only mode.
> >> + */
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> >> +
> >> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> >> + dev_info(dev, "M4 deinitialized in IPC-only mode\n");
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static const struct rproc_ops k3_m4_rproc_ops = {
> >> + .start = k3_m4_rproc_start,
> >> + .stop = k3_m4_rproc_stop,
> >> + .attach = k3_m4_rproc_attach,
> >> + .detach = k3_m4_rproc_detach,
> >> + .kick = k3_m4_rproc_kick,
> >> + .da_to_va = k3_m4_rproc_da_to_va,
> >> + .get_loaded_rsc_table = k3_m4_get_loaded_rsc_table,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> >> + const struct k3_m4_rproc_dev_data *data;
> >> + struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc;
> >> + struct rproc *rproc;
> >> + const char *fw_name;
> >> + bool r_state = false;
> >> + bool p_state = false;
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + data = device_get_match_data(dev);
> >> + if (!data)
> >> + return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >> + ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse firmware-name property\n");
> >> +
> >> + rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_m4_rproc_ops, fw_name,
> >> + sizeof(*kproc));
> >> + if (!rproc)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + rproc->has_iommu = false;
> >> + rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> >> + if (data->uses_lreset) {
> >> + rproc->ops->prepare = k3_m4_rproc_prepare;
> >> + rproc->ops->unprepare = k3_m4_rproc_unprepare;
> >> + }
> >> + kproc = rproc->priv;
> >> + kproc->rproc = rproc;
> >> + kproc->dev = dev;
> >> + kproc->data = data;
> >> +
> >> + kproc->ti_sci = devm_ti_sci_get_by_phandle(dev, "ti,sci");
> >> + if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci))
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci),
> >> + "failed to get ti-sci handle\n");
> >> +
> >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
> >> +
> >> + kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset))
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), "failed to get reset\n");
> >> +
> >> + kproc->tsp = k3_m4_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp))
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp),
> >> + "failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n");
> >> +
> >> + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n");
> >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, k3_m4_release_tsp, kproc->tsp);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = k3_m4_reserved_mem_init(kproc);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n");
> >> +
> >> + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id,
> >> + &r_state, &p_state);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> >> + "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n");
> >> +
> >> + /* configure devices for either remoteproc or IPC-only mode */
> >> + if (p_state) {
> >> + dev_info(dev, "configured M4 for IPC-only mode\n");
> >> + rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> >> + /* override rproc ops with only required IPC-only mode ops */
> >> + rproc->ops->prepare = NULL;
> >> + rproc->ops->unprepare = NULL;
> >> + rproc->ops->start = NULL;
> >> + rproc->ops->stop = NULL;
> >> + rproc->ops->attach = k3_m4_rproc_attach;
> >> + rproc->ops->detach = k3_m4_rproc_detach;
> >> + rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table = k3_m4_get_loaded_rsc_table;
> >> + } else {
> >> + dev_info(dev, "configured M4 for remoteproc mode\n");
> >> + /*
> >> + * ensure the M4 local reset is asserted to ensure the core
> >> + * doesn't execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module
> >> + * reset is released.
> >> + */
> >> + if (data->uses_lreset) {
> >> + ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset);
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get reset status\n");
> >> + } else if (ret == 0) {
> >> + dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n");
> >> + k3_m4_rproc_reset(kproc);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = devm_rproc_add(dev, rproc);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> >> + "failed to add register device with remoteproc core\n");
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static const struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data am64_m4_mems[] = {
> >> + { .name = "iram", .dev_addr = 0x0 },
> >> + { .name = "dram", .dev_addr = 0x30000 },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct k3_m4_rproc_dev_data am64_m4_data = {
> >> + .mems = am64_m4_mems,
> >> + .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(am64_m4_mems),
> >> + .uses_lreset = true,
> >
> > If this is the case, why carrying k3_m4_rproc_dev_data::uses_lreset and all the
> > code around it?
> >
>
> It was to keep most of these functions consistent with k3-r5 and k3-dsp drivers
> which do optionally have this local reset. For now I'll just remove it from
> here.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> > I am done reviewing this set.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mathieu
> >
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct of_device_id k3_m4_of_match[] = {
> >> + { .compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss", .data = &am64_m4_data, },
> >> + { /* sentinel */ },
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_m4_of_match);
> >> +
> >> +static struct platform_driver k3_m4_rproc_driver = {
> >> + .probe = k3_m4_rproc_probe,
> >> + .driver = {
> >> + .name = "k3-m4-rproc",
> >> + .of_match_table = k3_m4_of_match,
> >> + },
> >> +};
> >> +module_platform_driver(k3_m4_rproc_driver);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>");
> >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 M4 Remoteproc driver");
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >> --
> >> 2.39.2
> >>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list