[PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: xdma: Fix synchronization issue
Miquel Raynal
miquel.raynal at bootlin.com
Wed Mar 27 17:23:13 PDT 2024
Hi Lizhi,
> > @@ -376,6 +378,8 @@ static int xdma_xfer_start(struct xdma_chan *xchan)
> > return ret;
> > > xchan->busy = true;
> > + xchan->stop_requested = false;
> > + reinit_completion(&xchan->last_interrupt);
>
> If stop_requested is true, it should not start another transfer. So I would suggest to add
>
> if (xchan->stop_requested)
>
> return -ENODEV;
Maybe -EBUSY in this case?
I thought synchronize() was mandatory in-between. If that's not the
case then indeed we need to block or error-out if a new transfer
gets started.
>
> at the beginning of xdma_xfer_start().
>
> xdma_xfer_start() is protected by chan lock.
>
> > > return 0;
> > }
Thanks,
Miquèl
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list