[PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf at kernel.org
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf at kernel.org
Thu Mar 14 19:30:30 PDT 2024
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast at kernel.org>:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:38:07 +0100 you wrote:
> set_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.
>
> Check its return and take it into account as an error.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/7
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
> Cc: linux-hardening at vger.kernel.org <linux-hardening at vger.kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7d2cc63eca0c
- [bpf-next,v3,2/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e60adf513275
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list