[PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: add support for A4 based Amlogic BA400
Xianwei Zhao
xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com
Thu Mar 14 01:08:33 PDT 2024
Hi Jerome,
Thanks for your review.
On 2024/3/12 17:55, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On Tue 12 Mar 2024 at 17:18, Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay <devnull+xianwei.zhao.amlogic.com at kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
>>
>> Amlogic A4 is an application processor designed for smart audio
>> and IoT applications.
>>
>> Add basic support for the A4 based Amlogic BA400 board, which describes
>> the following components: CPU, GIC, IRQ, Timer and UART.
>> These are capable of booting up into the serial console.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4-a113l2-ba400.dts | 43 ++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4.dtsi | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 143 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile
>> index 1ab160bf928a..9a50ec11bb8d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile
>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MESON) += amlogic-a4-a113l2-ba400.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MESON) += amlogic-c3-c302x-aw409.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MESON) += amlogic-t7-a311d2-an400.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MESON) += amlogic-t7-a311d2-khadas-vim4.dtb
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4-a113l2-ba400.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4-a113l2-ba400.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..60f9f23858c6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4-a113l2-ba400.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Amlogic, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include "amlogic-a4.dtsi"
>
> Could you describe how the a4 and a5 differs from each other ?
> The description given in the commit description is the same.
>
> Beside the a53 vs a55, I'm not seeing much of a difference.
> Admittedly, there is not much yet but I wonder if a4 and a5 should have
> a common dtsi.
>
They are mostly the same, A5 include HiFi-DSP and NPU, but A4 is not.
And some peripheral modules are different, such as SPI and Ehernet phy.
I would like to wait for the follow-on chips to come out before
considering a merger with common dtsi file.
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Amlogic A113L2 ba400 Development Board";
>> + compatible = "amlogic,ba400","amlogic,a4";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + aliases {
>> + serial0 = &uart_b;
>> + };
>> +
>> + memory at 0 {
>> + device_type = "memory";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + reserved-memory {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + ranges;
>> +
>> + /* 52 MiB reserved for ARM Trusted Firmware */
>
> That's a lot of memory to blindly reserve.
> Any chance we can stop doing that and have u-boot amend reserved memory
> zone based on the actual needs of the device ?
Yes. U-boot will change size of reserved memory base on actual usage.
>
>> + secmon_reserved:linux,secmon {
>> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> + no-map;
>> + alignment = <0x0 0x400000>;
>> + reg = <0x0 0x05000000 0x0 0x3400000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&uart_b {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..7e8745010b52
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-a4.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Amlogic, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +/ {
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + cpu0: cpu at 0 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu1: cpu at 1 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x1>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu2: cpu at 2 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x2>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu3: cpu at 3 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x3>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + timer {
>> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
>> + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
>> + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
>> + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + psci {
>> + compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
>
> Really ? still on the that old version ?
> Will fix it. Use psci-1.0
>> + method = "smc";
>> + };
>> +
>> + xtal: xtal-clk {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "xtal";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + ranges;
>> +
>> + gic: interrupt-controller at fff01000 {
>> + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + #address-cells = <0>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + reg = <0x0 0xfff01000 0 0x1000>,
>> + <0x0 0xfff02000 0 0x2000>,
>> + <0x0 0xfff04000 0 0x2000>,
>> + <0x0 0xfff06000 0 0x2000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + apb at fe000000 {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>> +
>> + uart_b: serial at 7a000 {
>> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-uart",
>> + "amlogic,meson-ao-uart";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x7a000 0x0 0x18>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 169 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&xtal>, <&xtal>;
>> + clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
> --
> Jerome
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list