[PATCH 2/3] media: dt-bindings: nxp, imx8-isi: Allow single port for single pipeline models

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 01/03/2024 09:32, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 29. Februar 2024, 19:18:14 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 29/02/2024 19:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2024 15:17, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:16:31PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 03:04:44PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>>>>> In case the hardware only supports just one pipeline, allow using a
>>>>>> single port node as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is frowned upon in DT bindings, as it makes them more complicated
>>>>> for little gain. The recommendation is to always use a ports node if a
>>>>> device can have multiple ports for at least one of its compatibles.
>>>>
>>>> And reading the cover letter, I see this causes warnings. I think we
>>>> need guidance from Rob on this.
>>>
>>> Here was similar case:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240227142440.GA3863852-robh@kernel.org/
>>> and @Rob recommendation was to just use ports.
>>>
>>> It's true it causes warnings... or I should say - it was causing
>>> warnings (one of my last warnings in Samsung DTS for W=1).
>>>
>>> I wonder what's the base of this patchset?
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20231122-dtc-warnings-v2-1-bd4087325392@kernel.org/
>>
>> Uh, wait, this was not merged, so the warning still appears. Anyway the
>> preference is simpler schema, so just "ports".
> 
> Okay, thanks for that information. I'll drop this patch then.
> Just to be on the same side, this implies that using a single port
> in this case ( see patch 3) is not necessary/wanted, no?
> If so, I'll drop patch 3 as well.

Both patches are related, so if you drop this one, you cannot have #3.
Drop this and #3 as well.

Best regards,
Krzysztof