[PATCH] pwm: xilinx: Simplify using devm_ functions
Sean Anderson
sean.anderson at seco.com
Fri Jun 28 14:04:47 PDT 2024
On 6/28/24 02:35, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> There are devm variants for clk_prepare_enable() and pwmchip_add(); and
> clk_prepare_enable() can be done together with devm_clk_get(). This
> allows to simplify the error paths in .probe() and drop .remove()
> completely.
>
> With the remove callback gone, the last user of platform_get_drvdata()
> is gone and so the call to platform_set_drvdata() can be dropped, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-xilinx.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-xilinx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-xilinx.c
> index 3a7deebb0d0c..52c241982807 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-xilinx.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static int xilinx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(chip))
> return PTR_ERR(chip);
> priv = xilinx_pwm_chip_to_priv(chip);
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
>
> regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(regs))
> @@ -263,37 +262,24 @@ static int xilinx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * alas, such properties are not allowed to be used.
> */
>
> - priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "s_axi_aclk");
> + priv->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "s_axi_aclk");
> if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
> "Could not get clock\n");
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> + ret = devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get(dev, priv->clk);
> if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Clock enable failed\n");
> - clk_rate_exclusive_get(priv->clk);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to lock clock rate\n");
Isn't this actually "failed to allocate memory"? clk_rate_exclusive_get can't fail.
>
> chip->ops = &xilinx_pwm_ops;
> - ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
> - if (ret) {
> - clk_rate_exclusive_put(priv->clk);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> + ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
> + if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Could not register PWM chip\n");
> - }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void xilinx_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - struct pwm_chip *chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - struct xilinx_timer_priv *priv = xilinx_pwm_chip_to_priv(chip);
> -
> - pwmchip_remove(chip);
> - clk_rate_exclusive_put(priv->clk);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> -}
> -
> static const struct of_device_id xilinx_pwm_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "xlnx,xps-timer-1.00.a", },
> {},
> @@ -302,7 +288,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xilinx_pwm_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver xilinx_pwm_driver = {
> .probe = xilinx_pwm_probe,
> - .remove_new = xilinx_pwm_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "xilinx-pwm",
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(xilinx_pwm_of_match),
>
> base-commit: 642a16ca7994a50d7de85715996a8ce171a5bdfb
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson at seco.com>
[StudioX, SECO SpA]<https://www.seco.com/applications/studiox>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list