[PATCH v2 3/5] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: Use TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x) instead of TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at baylibre.com
Wed Jun 26 12:43:26 PDT 2024
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:56:15PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:38:38PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Which patches need to be in the pull-request and which can be hoovered
> > up by their associated subsystems?
>
> The dependencies are as follows:
>
> #1 <- #2 <- #3 <- #4
> ^
> #5
>
> So the practical options are (in the order of my not very strong preference):
>
> - Immutable branch with #1 - #4 (assuming William is ok to let you
> merge #3), and then I can add #5 (and further work on the pwm-stm32
> driver that I'm currently working on). Maybe William even doesn't
> need to pull; I didn't check.
>
> - Immutable branch with only #1 and #2. Then William can pull and add
> #3 and I can pull and add #5. #4 can be applied later then.
> (I can remind about #4 in the next cycle.)
>
> - Immutable branch with #1 - #5
> (Reminder: In that case please fixup the pwm patch's short log with
> s/-/: /)
> I would add this for sure to the pwm tree. I didn't even try to check
> if it's needed for mfd and/or counter. So if you don't need it, I
> volunteer to create that branch, but if you want to do it, that's
> just fine, too.
I wonder what's the state here. Maybe Lee waiting for William to send an
Ack that Lee can do the first option?
Best regards
Uwe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240626/77af14d3/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list