[PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: ti: am645-system-controller: add child nodes used by main domain

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:23:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.06.24 18:24, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:20:49AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com>
> >>
> >> Expand bindings to cover both the MCU and the main usage of the AM654
> >> system controller.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml    | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> >> index e79803e586ca..0eec807f38df 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,35 @@ patternProperties:
> >>      type: object
> >>      $ref: /schemas/phy/ti,phy-gmii-sel.yaml#
> >>  
> >> +  "^mux-controller$":
> >> +    type: object
> >> +    description:
> >> +      This is the SERDES lane control mux.
> > 
> > Where is this object described?
> > 
> 
> Nowhere so far - I've only followed the pattern in
> mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml. Would adding "ref:
> /schemas/mux/reg-mux.yaml" be enough?

I think that would be okay, yea
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240625/48372e32/attachment.sig>