[PATCH v1] perf arm: Workaround ARM PMUs cpu maps having offline cpus
Yicong Yang
yangyicong at huawei.com
Wed Jun 12 03:16:14 PDT 2024
Hi Ian,
On 2024/6/7 14:53, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When PMUs have a cpu map in the 'cpus' or 'cpumask' file, perf will
> try to open events on those CPUs. ARM doesn't remove offline CPUs
> meaning taking a CPU offline will cause perf commands to fail unless a
> CPU map is passed on the command line.
>
> More context in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603092812.46616-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/
>
> Reported-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong at huawei.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603092812.46616-2-yangyicong@huawei.com/
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers at google.com>
Tested worked for this case:
[root at localhost tmp]# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
[root at localhost tmp]# /home/yang/perf_static stat -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ --timeout 100
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 19 (No such device) for event (armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
[root at localhost tmp]# /tmp/perf_Ian stat -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ --timeout 100
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
54994604 armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/
0.176079800 seconds time elapsed
So:
Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong at hisilicon.com>
But still wondering why isn't it better to move this into pmu_cpumask() as does in
the previous patch? Yes currently this is a arm specific issue, but we cannot handle
the case if later PMU doesn't update the cpus/cpumask either :)
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
> index 8b7cb68ba1a8..6b544edbd3f6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
> @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@
>
> #include "arm-spe.h"
> #include "hisi-ptt.h"
> +#include "../../../util/cpumap.h"
> #include "../../../util/pmu.h"
> #include "../../../util/cs-etm.h"
> #include "../../arm64/util/mem-events.h"
>
> -void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused)
> +void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> {
> + struct perf_cpu_map *intersect;
> +
> #ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
> if (!strcmp(pmu->name, CORESIGHT_ETM_PMU_NAME)) {
> /* add ETM default config here */
> @@ -33,6 +36,9 @@ void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused)
> pmu->selectable = true;
> #endif
> }
> -
> #endif
> + /* Workaround some ARM PMU's failing to correctly set CPU maps for online processors. */
> + intersect = perf_cpu_map__intersect(cpu_map__online(), pmu->cpus);
> + perf_cpu_map__put(pmu->cpus);
> + pmu->cpus = intersect;
> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list