[PATCH v4 10/13] KVM: arm64: nVHE: Support CONFIG_CFI_CLANG at EL2
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Wed Jun 5 09:11:37 PDT 2024
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:04:40PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:45:30PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:12:16PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S
> > > index d859c4de06b6..b1c8977e2812 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > > */
> > >
> > > #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > > +#include <linux/cfi_types.h>
> > > #include <linux/linkage.h>
> > >
> > > #include <asm/alternative.h>
> > > @@ -267,8 +268,11 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__kvm_handle_stub_hvc)
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * void __pkvm_init_switch_pgd(phys_addr_t pgd, void *sp, void (*fn)(void));
> > > + *
> > > + * SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START() allows C to call this ID-mapped function indirectly
> > > + * using a physical pointer without triggering a kCFI failure.
> > > */
> > > -SYM_FUNC_START(__pkvm_init_switch_pgd)
> > > +SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(__pkvm_init_switch_pgd)
> > > /* Turn the MMU off */
> > > pre_disable_mmu_workaround
> > > mrs x9, sctlr_el2
> >
> > I still think this last hunk should be merged with the earlier patch
> > fixing up the prototype of __pkvm_init_switch_pgd().
>
> Unfortunately, this is not possible because
>
> SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(__pkvm_init_switch_pgd)
>
> makes the assembler generate an unresolved symbol for the function type, which
> the compiler only generates (from the C declaration) if it compiles with kCFI so
> that moving this hunk to an earlier patch results in a linker error:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __kvm_nvhe___kcfi_typeid___pkvm_init_switch_pgd
>
> OTOH, moving it to a later patch triggers a kCFI (runtime) panic.
>
> As a result, this hunk *must* be part of this patch.
Argh, thanks for the explanation. I thought CONFIG_CFI_CLANG would save
us here, but that's already enabled for the rest of the kernel so now I
understand what you mean.
> > With that:
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
>
> As I haven't followed your suggestion, I'll ignore this.
You can keep the Ack.
Cheers,
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list