[PATCH RFC v3 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: cp110-utmi-phy: add compatible string for armada-38x

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 22/07/2024 17:14, Josua Mayer wrote:
> 
> Am 22.07.24 um 17:05 schrieb Josua Mayer:
>> Am 21.07.24 um 11:31 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>>> On 20/07/2024 16:19, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>>> Armada 38x USB-2.0 PHYs are similar to Armada 8K (CP110) and can be
>>>> supported by the same driver with small differences.
>>>>
>>>> Add new compatible string for armada-38x variant of utmi phy.
>>>> Then add descriptions and names for two additional register definitions
>>>> that may be specified instead of a syscon phandle.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua at solid-run.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml         | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml
>>>> index 9ce7b4c6d208..246e48d51755 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml
> cut
>>>> @@ -68,7 +93,6 @@ required:
>>>>    - reg
>>>>    - "#address-cells"
>>>>    - "#size-cells"
>>>> -  - marvell,system-controller
>>> you miss here allOf:if:then: narrowing and marvell,system-controller per
>>> each variant.
> I am struggling a bit with the options.
> 
> First attempt says: if not both usb-cfg and utmi-cfg reg-names are specified,
> then marvell,system-controller is required.
> 
> allOf:
>   - required:

That's not part of allOf.

>       - compatible
>       - reg
>       - "#address-cells"
>       - "#size-cells"
>   - if:
>       not:
>         properties:
>           reg-names:
>             allOf:
>               - contains:
>                   const: usb-cfg
>               - contains:
>                   const: utmi-cfg
>     then:
>       required:
>         - marvell,system-controller
> 
> This works okay for any combinations of reg-names.

??? I expected this to be per variant.

> 
> However when device-tree is missing reg-names all together,
> marvell,system-controller is not marked required.
> 
> Would it be acceptable to make reg-names required?

I don't understand what you want to achieve.

Best regards,
Krzysztof