[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document QCS9100 SMMU

[Tengfei Fan]

On 7/11/2024 6:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 09:39:29PM +0800, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>> Document the SMMU on the QCS9100 platform.
>> QCS9100 is drived from SA8775p. Currently, both the QCS9100 and SA8775p
>> platform use non-SCMI resource. In the future, the SA8775p platform will
>> move to use SCMI resources and it will have new sa8775p-related device
>> tree. Consequently, introduce "qcom,qcs9100-smmu-500" to describe
>> non-SCMI based SMMU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan at quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Introduce support for the QCS9100 SoC device tree (DTSI) and the
>> QCS9100 RIDE board DTS. The QCS9100 is a variant of the SA8775p.
>> While the QCS9100 platform is still in the early design stage, the
>> QCS9100 RIDE board is identical to the SA8775p RIDE board, except it
>> mounts the QCS9100 SoC instead of the SA8775p SoC.
>>
>> The QCS9100 SoC DTSI is directly renamed from the SA8775p SoC DTSI, and
>> all the compatible strings will be updated from "SA8775p" to "QCS9100".
>> The QCS9100 device tree patches will be pushed after all the device tree
>> bindings and device driver patches are reviewed.
>>
>> The final dtsi will like:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240703025850.2172008-3-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com/
>>
>> The detailed cover letter reference:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240703025850.2172008-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com/
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>    - Split huge patch series into different patch series according to
>>      subsytems
>>    - Update patch commit message
>>
>> prevous disscussion here:
>> [1] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240703025850.2172008-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com/
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> Sorry, but this doesn't apply against my bindings branch:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=for-joerg/arm-smmu/bindings
> 
> Will

Sorry, I think there is something wrong with sending this patch through 
b4 tool. I will correct this issue in the next version patch series.

-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan