[PATCH v3 1/3] perf: Add perf_event_attr::bp_priv
Tiezhu Yang
yangtiezhu at loongson.cn
Tue Jul 9 05:05:40 PDT 2024
On 07/09/2024 06:03 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 05:55:04PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> When developing hardware watchpoint on LoongArch, we want to set the
>> same privilege passed by the ptrace user data, but there is no bridge
>> to save this value like bp_addr, bp_type and bp_len. This is a common
>> issue for the archs which have privilege level of breakpoint.
>>
>> Add a member "bp_priv" which lives in a union on config3 at the end
>> of the uapi struct perf_event_attr to make a bridge between ptrace
>> and hardware breakpoint.
>>
>> This is preparation for later patch on some archs such as ARM, ARM64
>> and LoongArch which have privilege level of breakpoint.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu at loongson.cn>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 5 ++++-
>> kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 3a64499b0f5d..abe8da7a1f60 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -521,7 +521,10 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>> */
>> __u64 sig_data;
>>
>> - __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
>> + union {
>> + __u8 bp_priv; /* privilege level of breakpoint */
>> + __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
>> index 6c2cb4e4f48d..3ad16b226e4f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
>> @@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ static void hw_breakpoint_copy_attr(struct perf_event_attr *to,
>> to->bp_addr = from->bp_addr;
>> to->bp_type = from->bp_type;
>> to->bp_len = from->bp_len;
>> + to->bp_priv = from->bp_priv;
>> to->disabled = from->disabled;
>> }
>
> Sorry, but I still don't see why we should change uapi for this. As I
> have said multiple times, this is unnecessary.
Thanks for your review, I see your point but let us wait
for more comments from perf people.
Thanks,
Tiezhu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list