[PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: dts: broadcom: bcmbca: Add NAND controller node
Florian Fainelli
florian.fainelli at broadcom.com
Wed Jan 24 19:34:37 PST 2024
On 1/24/2024 7:09 PM, William Zhang wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 1/24/24 09:30, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> dregan at broadcom.com wrote on Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:04:50 -0800:
>>
>>> From: William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for Broadcom STB NAND controller in BCMBCA ARMv7 chip dts
>>> files.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Regan <dregan at broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3: None
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47622.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm63138.dtsi | 10 +++++++++-
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm63148.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm63178.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm6756.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm6846.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm6855.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm6878.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm947622.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm963138.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm963138dvt.dts | 12 +++++-------
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm963148.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm963178.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm96756.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm96846.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm96855.dts | 4 ++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm96878.dts | 4 ++++
>>> 17 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47622.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47622.dtsi
>>> index 7cd38de118c3..55ff18043d96 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47622.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47622.dtsi
>>> @@ -138,6 +138,23 @@ hsspi: spi at 1000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> + nand_controller: nand-controller at 1800 {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + compatible = "brcm,nand-bcm63138", "brcm,brcmnand-v7.1",
>>> "brcm,brcmnand";
>>> + reg = <0x1800 0x600>, <0x2000 0x10>;
>>> + reg-names = "nand", "nand-int-base";
>>> + brcm,nand-use-wp = <0>;
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + nandcs: nand at 0 {
>>> + compatible = "brcm,nandcs";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + nand-on-flash-bbt;
>>> + brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap;
>>
>> Describing the NAND chip in a SoC DTSI does not look relevant to me.
>> Even more if you add something like this nand-ecc-use-strap setting
>> which is very board dependent.
>>
> I am not sure if I understand you comments correctly but are you
> suggesting to put this whole nand controller node into each board dts?
> We have other ip block nodes like SPI, uart in this same soc dtsi file
> too. For all the bcmbca soc dtsi I am updating here(and its board
> design), we always use the strap to for ecc setting. So I thought it
> should be okay to put brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap in the default dtsi file.
> For any board that uses the raw nand nand-ecc property, the board dts
> can do so and override the brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap setting.
I read Miquel's comment as meaning that the nandcs aka the NAND
chip/flash part description should be in the board .dts file, while the
controller itself can remain in the .dtsi file with its status =
"disabled" property.
Are there customer boards, that is non reference boards that might chose
a different chip select number and/or not use the strap settings?
--
Florian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4221 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240124/10d22a8e/attachment.p7s>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list