[PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add R8A779H0 V4M CPG Core Clock Definitions

[Wolfram Sang]

> > For new bindings, or also for existing ones?
> > Doing the former means there are inconsistencies among different SoCs
> > in the same family.
> 
> For the new ones. It's just naming inconsistency which does not cause
> any issues. Otherwise you never move to vendor,device.h format... which
> is not that critical, but in the long term brings uniformity.

I haven't reviewed the patch itself, but for the naming scheme I'd
suggest to follow Krzysztof's suggestion. If he is OK with this level of
uniformity, then all is good, I'd say. Converting existing ones sounds
more messy to me.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240124/9ef6e847/attachment.sig>