[PATCH 3/9] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: update to use new exynos_pmu_*() apis
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Tue Jan 23 10:12:41 PST 2024
On 23/01/2024 18:30, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>> dev_warn(wdt->dev, "Couldn't get RST_STAT register\n");
>>> else if (rst_stat & BIT(wdt->drv_data->rst_stat_bit))
>>> @@ -698,14 +699,6 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> - if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRKS_HAVE_PMUREG) {
>>> - wdt->pmureg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>>> - "samsung,syscon-phandle");
>>> - if (IS_ERR(wdt->pmureg))
>>> - return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(wdt->pmureg),
>>> - "syscon regmap lookup failed.\n");
>>
>>
>> Continuing topic from the binding: I don't see how you handle probe
>> deferral, suspend ordering.
>
> The current implementation is simply relying on exynos-pmu being
> postcore_initcall level.
>
> I was just looking around for any existing Linux APIs that could be a
> more robust solution. It looks like
>
> of_parse_phandle()
> and
> of_find_device_by_node();
>
> Are often used to solve this type of probe deferral issue between
> devices. Is that what you would recommend using? Or is there something
> even better?
I think you should keep the phandle and then set device link based on
of_find_device_by_node(). This would actually improve the code, because
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() does not create device links.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list