[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95 Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible

Peng Fan peng.fan at nxp.com
Tue Jan 23 07:16:02 PST 2024


> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95
> Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible
> 
> On 23/01/2024 15:38, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> >
> > Add i.MX95 Generic, Secure Enclave and V2X Message Unit compatible
> string.
> > And some MUs has internal RAMs for SCMI shared buffer usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml        | 50
> +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
> > index 12e7a7d536a3..569fabc5285c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
> > @@ -29,10 +29,14 @@ properties:
> >        - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu
> >        - const: fsl,imx8-mu-scu
> >        - const: fsl,imx8-mu-seco
> > -      - const: fsl,imx93-mu-s4
> >        - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu-s4
> > +      - const: fsl,imx93-mu-s4
> > +      - const: fsl,imx95-mu-ele
> > +      - const: fsl,imx95-mu-v2x
> >        - items:
> > -          - const: fsl,imx93-mu
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - fsl,imx93-mu
> > +              - fsl,imx95-mu
> >            - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu
> >        - items:
> >            - enum:
> > @@ -95,6 +99,17 @@ properties:
> >    power-domains:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >
> > +  ranges: true
> > +
> > +  "#address-cells": true
> > +
> > +  "#size-cells": true
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > +  "^sram@[a-z0-9]+":
> 
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 

Oh, sorry, I overlooked this. Will send out v4 later, waiting
to see whether Sascha has comments on the driver part.

Thanks,
Peng.

> It seems my or otSher reviewer's previous comments were not fully addressed.
> Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to
> apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list