[PATCH v4 7/8] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: define USI8 with I2C configuration

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 1/23/24 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/01/2024 09:57, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/23/24 08:44, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>> However I don't fully understand why that dependency - except patch hunk
>>>> context - exists. You shouldn't have such dependency.
>>>>
>>> Let me try offline, I'll get back to you.
>>
>> The dropped patches depend on the dt-bindings patch that you queued
>> through the "next/drivers" branch:
>>
>> b393a6c5e656 dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101-clock: add PERIC0 clock
>> management unit
>>
>> We need the peric0 bindings that are referenced in device tree, that's
>> why the next/dt64 branch failed to build.
>>
>> Please let me know if there's something on my side that I have to do
>> (now or in the future).
> 
> It is useful to mention this in cover letter, so I will know how to
> apply the patches. I understand therefore the dependency mention in the

Thanks for the patience, I learn along the way.

> cover letter is not accurate, so I can ignore that aspect.
> 

Yes, that's right. The dependency on name fixes is just as a patch hunk
context, no functional or build dependencies. I now know the process,
and I'll be more verbose next time.

Cheers,
ta