[PATCH 24/25] KVM: arm64: Make FEAT_MOPS UNDEF if not advertised to the guest

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Mon Jan 22 12:18:51 PST 2024


We unconditionally enable FEAT_MOPS, which is obviously wrong.

So let's only do that when it is advertised to the guest.
Which means we need to rely on a per-vcpu HCRX_EL2 shadow register.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h        | 4 +---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c               | 8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
index 3c6f8ba1e479..a1769e415d72 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -102,9 +102,7 @@
 #define HCR_HOST_NVHE_PROTECTED_FLAGS (HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS | HCR_TSC)
 #define HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_TGE | HCR_E2H)
 
-#define HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS \
-	(HCRX_EL2_SMPME | HCRX_EL2_TCR2En | \
-	 (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_MOPS) ? (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_MCE2) : 0))
+#define HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS (HCRX_EL2_SMPME | HCRX_EL2_TCR2En)
 #define HCRX_HOST_FLAGS (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_TCR2En)
 
 /* TCR_EL2 Registers bits */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index fe5ed4bcded0..22343354db3e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 	/* Values of trap registers for the guest. */
 	u64 hcr_el2;
+	u64 hcrx_el2;
 	u64 mdcr_el2;
 	u64 cptr_el2;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 2d5891518006..e3fcf8c4d5b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline void __activate_traps_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	write_sysreg(vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2, mdcr_el2);
 
 	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) {
-		u64 hcrx = HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS;
+		u64 hcrx = vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2;
 		if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) && !is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) {
 			u64 clr = 0, set = 0;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index afe6975fcf5c..b7977e08e4ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -3952,6 +3952,14 @@ void kvm_init_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, TLB, OS))
 		vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_TTLBOS;
 
+	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) {
+		vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 = HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS;
+
+		if (kvm_has_feat(kern_hyp_va(vcpu->kvm),
+				 ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, MOPS, IMP))
+			vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_MCE2);
+	}
+
 	if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_FGU_INITIALIZED, &kvm->arch.flags))
 		goto out;
 
-- 
2.39.2




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list