[PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: mtd: brcmnand: Updates for bcmbca SoCs
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Fri Jan 19 09:12:35 PST 2024
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:53:47AM -0800, dregan at broadcom.com wrote:
> From: William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
>
> Update the descriptions to reflect different families of broadband SoC and
> use the general name bcmbca for ARM based SoC.
>
> Add brcm,nand-use-wp property to have an option for disabling this
> feature on broadband board design that does not use write protection.
>
> Add brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap to get ecc setting from board boot strap for
> broadband board designs because they do not specify ecc setting in dts
> but rather using the strap setting.
>
> Remove the requirement of interrupts property to reflect the driver
> code. Also add myself to the list of maintainers.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Regan <dregan at broadcom.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Revert the new compatible string nand-bcmbca
> - Drop the BCM63168 compatible fix to avoid any potential ABI
> incompatibility issue
> - Simplify the explanation for brcm,nand-use-wp
> - Keep the interrupt name requirement when interrupt number is specified
> ---
> .../bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml | 36 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml
> index f57e96374e67..56176ec1a992 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ title: Broadcom STB NAND Controller
> maintainers:
> - Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com>
> - Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev at gmail.com>
> + - William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
>
> description: |
> The Broadcom Set-Top Box NAND controller supports low-level access to raw NAND
> @@ -18,9 +19,10 @@ description: |
> supports basic PROGRAM and READ functions, among other features.
>
> This controller was originally designed for STB SoCs (BCM7xxx) but is now
> - available on a variety of Broadcom SoCs, including some BCM3xxx, BCM63xx, and
> - iProc/Cygnus. Its history includes several similar (but not fully register
> - compatible) versions.
> + available on a variety of Broadcom SoCs, including some BCM3xxx, MIPS based
> + Broadband SoC (BCM63xx), ARM based Broadband SoC (BCMBCA) and iProc/Cygnus.
> + Its history includes several similar (but not fully register compatible)
> + versions.
>
> -- Additional SoC-specific NAND controller properties --
>
> @@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ properties:
> - brcm,brcmnand-v7.2
> - brcm,brcmnand-v7.3
> - const: brcm,brcmnand
> - - description: BCM63138 SoC-specific NAND controller
> + - description: BCMBCA SoC-specific NAND controller
> items:
> - const: brcm,nand-bcm63138
> - enum:
> @@ -65,7 +67,7 @@ properties:
> - const: brcm,nand-iproc
> - const: brcm,brcmnand-v6.1
> - const: brcm,brcmnand
> - - description: BCM63168 SoC-specific NAND controller
> + - description: BCM63xx SoC-specific NAND controller
> items:
> - const: brcm,nand-bcm63168
> - const: brcm,nand-bcm6368
> @@ -111,6 +113,17 @@ properties:
> earlier versions of this core that include WP
> type: boolean
>
> + brcm,nand-use-wp:
> + description:
> + Use this property to indicate if board design uses
> + controller's write protection feature and connects its
> + NAND_WPb pin to nand chip's WP_L pin. Driver defaults to
> + use this feature when this property does not exist.
> + Set to 0 if WP pins are not connected and feature is not
> + used. Set to 1 if WP pins are connected and feature is used.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + enum: [0, 1]
This property does not make sense to me. "Driver defaults to use this
feature when the property does not exist" - either the property name is
backwards or the description is. Secondly, I don't get why the property
is an enum in the first place - depending on which if the name or
description is wrong, either 0 or 1 would overlap with the default.
> patternProperties:
> "^nand@[a-f0-9]$":
> type: object
> @@ -137,6 +150,16 @@ patternProperties:
> layout.
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>
> + brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap:
> + description:
> + This flag is used by the driver to get the ecc strength and
> + spare area size from the SoC NAND boot strap setting. This
> + is commonly used by the BCMBCA SoC board design. If ecc
> + strength and spare area size are set by nand-ecc-strength
> + and brcm,nand-oob-sector-size in the dts, these settings
> + have precedence and override this flag.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
This property I'm not all that sure about either. If the specific
properties that you mention here are not set in the DT what happens at
the moment?
I suppose what I am getting at is why are the bootstrap settings not
always used in the absence of specific values provided in the DT?
Thanks,
Conor.
> +
> unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> allOf:
> @@ -177,6 +200,8 @@ allOf:
> - const: iproc-idm
> - const: iproc-ext
> - if:
> + required:
> + - interrupts
> properties:
> interrupts:
> minItems: 2
> @@ -189,7 +214,6 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
> required:
> - reg
> - reg-names
> - - interrupts
>
> examples:
> - |
> --
> 2.37.3
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240119/b07148b6/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list