[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to json-schema

[Dharma.B at microchip.com]

On 17/01/24 9:03 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> 
> ForwardedMessage.eml
> 
> Subject:
> Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to 
> json-schema
> From:
> Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org>
> Date:
> 17/01/24, 9:03 pm
> 
> To:
> Dharma.B at microchip.com
> CC:
> alexandre.belloni at bootlin.com, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com, 
> sam at ravnborg.org, bbrezillon at kernel.org, 
> maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com, mripard at kernel.org, 
> tzimmermann at suse.de, airlied at gmail.com, daniel at ffwll.ch, 
> robh+dt at kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org, 
> conor+dt at kernel.org, Nicolas.Ferre at microchip.com, 
> claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev, dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org, 
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, 
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, lee at kernel.org, thierry.reding at gmail.com, 
> u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de, linux-pwm at vger.kernel.org, 
> Linux4Microchip at microchip.com
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:43:00AM +0000,Dharma.B at microchip.com  wrote:
>> On 17/01/24 1:40 am, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 16/01/2024 18:03:19+0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 05:07:59PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>>>>> Convert device tree bindings for Atmel's HLCDC PWM controller to YAML
>>>>> format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani<dharma.b at microchip.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> changelog
>>>>> v1 -> v2
>>>>> - Remove the explicit copyrights.
>>>>> - Modify title (not include words like binding/driver).
>>>>> - Modify description actually describing the hardware and not the driver.
>>>>> - Remove pinctrl properties which aren't required.
>>>>> - Drop parent node and it's other sub-device node which are not related here.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    .../bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml         | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    .../bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt          | 29 ------------
>>>>>    2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
>>>>>    delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..751122309fa9
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>> The original file has no license, but was originally written by a
>>>> free-electrons employee, so the relicensing here is fine.
>>>>
>>> I confirm relicensing is fine, even assigning the copyright to
>>> Microchip (note that Bootlin is legally the same entity as
>>> free-electrons)
>> Thanks Conor and Alexandre.
>> I will add the copyrights back in v3.
> Just to note, in case you misunderstood my original comment here:
> What I said had nothing to do with adding a Microchip copyright assignment
> to the file, but rather about the fact that your patch relicenses the
> binding from GPL v2 to GPL v2 OR BSD 2 Clause.
I appreciate the clarification; my initial understanding was not 
accurate. Thanks
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.