[PATCH] perf print-events: make is_event_supported() more robust
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Jan 17 04:12:05 PST 2024
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:05:25AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:03:48 +0000,
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the perf tool doesn't deteect support for extneded event types
> > on Apple M1/M2 systems, and will not auto-expand plain PERF_EVENT_TYPE
> > hardware events into per-PMU events. This is due to the detection of
> > extended event types not handling mandatory filters required by the
> > M1/M2 PMU driver.
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> I've given your patch a go on my M1 box, and it indeed makes things
> substantially better:
>
> $ sudo ./perf stat -e cycles ~/hackbench 100 process 1000
> Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
> Time: 3.419
>
> Performance counter stats for '/home/maz/hackbench 100 process 1000':
>
> 174,783,472,090 apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles/ (93.10%)
> 39,134,744,813 apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles/ (71.86%)
>
> 3.568145595 seconds time elapsed
>
> 12.203084000 seconds user
> 55.135271000 seconds sys
Thanks for giving that a spin!
> However, I'm seeing some slightly odd behaviours:
>
> $ sudo ./perf stat -e cycles:k ~/hackbench 100 process 1000
> Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
> Time: 3.313
>
> Performance counter stats for '/home/maz/hackbench 100 process 1000':
>
> <not supported> apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles:k/
> <not supported> apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles:k/
>
> 3.467568841 seconds time elapsed
>
> 13.080111000 seconds user
> 53.162099000 seconds sys
>
> I would have expected it to count, but it didn't. For that to work, I
> have to add the 'H' modifier:
Ok, so that'll have something to do with the way the tool chooses which
perf_evant_attr::exclude_* bits to set. I thought that was the same for plain
events and pmu_name/event/ events, but I could be mistaken.
Is that something you had tried prior to this patch, and did that "just work"
with the explicit pmu_name/event/ syntax prior to this patch?
e.g. did something like:
perf stat -e apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles/k -e apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles/k ./workload
... happen to work withiout requiring the addition of 'H'?
If so, does that behave the same before/after this patch?
... and could you run that with '-vvv' and dump the output for comparison?
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list