[PATCH] dt-bindings: rockchip: Fix Hardkernel ODROID-M1 board bindings
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Tue Jan 16 00:31:35 PST 2024
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2024, 08:24:44 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 16/01/2024 03:00, Tim Lunn wrote:
> >
> > On 1/16/24 01:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 15/01/2024 15:51, KyuHyuk Lee wrote:
> >>> The vendor in ODROID-M1 is hardkernel, but it was incorrectly written
> >>> as rockchip. Fixed the vendor prefix correctly.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: KyuHyuk Lee <lee at kyuhyuk.kr>
> >>> ---
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> You need to start testing your patches. Your last M1 fails as well in
> >> multiple places.
> >>
> >> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
> >> `make dtbs_check W=1` (see
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
> >> https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
> >> for instructions).
> >>
> >> The DTS change will break the users, so would be nice to mention this in
> >> its commit msg.
> >
> > I notice there are a couple of other boards that incorrectly use
> > rockchip as the vendor also:
> >
> > - const: rockchip,rk3399-orangepi
> > - const: rockchip,rk3568-bpi-r2pro
> >
> > Perhaps these should also be fixed at the same time?
>
> What is happening with rockchip boards?
Copy-paste stuff ... boards using rockchip,boardname instead of
vendor,boardname for their compatible.
I do remember us noticing this a number of times on some boards
and requesting fixes, but looks like some slipped through.
So I guess Tim is suggesting changing the compatible, but with boards
being merged a while ago, this would break backwards compatibility.
So I guess both the Orange and Banana Pies will need to live with that.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list