[PATCH v8 1/1] i2c: lpi2c: use clk notifier for rate changes
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Thu Jan 11 00:51:30 PST 2024
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:05:56PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin at siemens.com>
>
> Instead of repeatedly calling clk_get_rate for each transfer, register
> a clock notifier to update the cached divider value each time the clock
> rate actually changes.
> A deadlock has been observed while adding tlv320aic32x4 audio codec to
> the system. When this clock provider adds its clock, the clk mutex is
> locked already, it needs to access i2c, which in return needs the mutex
> for clk_get_rate as well.
>
> Fixes: a55fa9d0e42e ("i2c: imx-lpi2c: add low power i2c bus driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin at siemens.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> * Improved commit message describing an actual observed deadlock
>
> Changes in v7:
> * Use dev_err_probe
> * Reworked/Shortened the commit message
> It is not about saving CPU cycles, but to avoid locking the clk subsystem
> upon each transfer.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> index 678b30e90492a..3070e605fd8ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> * Copyright 2016 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ struct lpi2c_imx_struct {
> __u8 *rx_buf;
> __u8 *tx_buf;
> struct completion complete;
> + struct notifier_block clk_change_nb;
> + atomic_t rate_per;
> unsigned int msglen;
> unsigned int delivered;
> unsigned int block_data;
> @@ -197,6 +200,20 @@ static void lpi2c_imx_stop(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> } while (1);
> }
>
> +static int lpi2c_imx_clk_change_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> + struct clk_notifier_data *ndata = data;
> + struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx = container_of(nb,
> + struct lpi2c_imx_struct,
> + clk_change_nb);
> +
> + if (action & POST_RATE_CHANGE)
> + atomic_set(&lpi2c_imx->rate_per, ndata->new_rate);
> +
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> /* CLKLO = I2C_CLK_RATIO * CLKHI, SETHOLD = CLKHI, DATAVD = CLKHI/2 */
> static int lpi2c_imx_config(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> {
> @@ -207,7 +224,7 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_config(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
>
> lpi2c_imx_set_mode(lpi2c_imx);
>
> - clk_rate = clk_get_rate(lpi2c_imx->clks[0].clk);
> + clk_rate = atomic_read(&lpi2c_imx->rate_per);
> if (!clk_rate)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -590,6 +607,27 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + lpi2c_imx->clk_change_nb.notifier_call = lpi2c_imx_clk_change_cb;
> + ret = devm_clk_notifier_register(&pdev->dev, lpi2c_imx->clks[0].clk,
> + &lpi2c_imx->clk_change_nb);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "can't register peripheral clock notifier\n");
> + /*
> + * Lock the clock rate to avoid rate change between clk_get_rate() and
> + * atomic_set()
> + */
> + ret = clk_rate_exclusive_get(lpi2c_imx->clks[0].clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "can't lock I2C peripheral clock rate\n");
> +
> + atomic_set(&lpi2c_imx->rate_per, clk_get_rate(lpi2c_imx->clks[0].clk));
> + clk_rate_exclusive_put(lpi2c_imx->clks[0].clk);
> + if (!atomic_read(&lpi2c_imx->rate_per))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL,
> + "can't get I2C peripheral clock rate\n");
> +
If the clkrate isn't expected to actually change, you can just delay the
call to clk_rate_exclusive_put() until driver unbind time and not
register a notifier at all. The result would be more lightweight, you
wouldn't even need an atomic variable for .rate_per.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240104225512.1124519-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
might be beneficial for that.
Having said that, improving the locking in the clk framework to not
trigger this deadlock would be nice.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240111/717625a7/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list