[PATCH] arm64: scs: Work around full LTO issue with dynamic SCS

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Wed Jan 10 11:16:39 PST 2024


On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:26:20PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> 
> Full LTO takes the '-mbranch-protection=none' passed to the compiler
> when generating the dynamic shadow call stack patching code as a hint to
> stop emitting PAC instructions altogether. (Thin LTO appears unaffected
> by this)
> 
> Work around this by stripping unwind tables from the object in question,
> which should be sufficient to prevent the patching code from attempting
> to patch itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>

Thanks for finding a work-around for this! Do you want to include
the Reported-by: or Cc: stable at ... tags for this? 

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>

-Kees

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> index d95b3d6b471a..e5d03a7039b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -73,7 +73,13 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE)			+= mte.o
>  obj-y					+= vdso-wrap.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO)		+= vdso32-wrap.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS)	+= patch-scs.o
> -CFLAGS_patch-scs.o			+= -mbranch-protection=none
> +
> +# We need to prevent the SCS patching code from patching itself. Using
> +# -mbranch-protection=none here to avoid the patchable PAC opcodes from being
> +# generated triggers an issue with full LTO on Clang, which stops emitting PAC
> +# instructions altogether. So instead, omit the unwind tables used by the
> +# patching code, so it will not be able to locate its own PAC instructions.
> +CFLAGS_patch-scs.o			+= -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-unwind-tables
>  
>  # Force dependency (vdso*-wrap.S includes vdso.so through incbin)
>  $(obj)/vdso-wrap.o: $(obj)/vdso/vdso.so
> -- 
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
> 

-- 
Kees Cook



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list