[PATCH RFC v2 02/11] dt-bindings: gpu: Add PowerVR Series5 SGX GPUs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/01/2024 17:53, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 1/9/24 5:32 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/01/2024 19:32, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>> The Imagination PowerVR Series5 "SGX" GPU is part of several SoCs from
>>> multiple vendors. Describe how the SGX GPU is integrated in these SoC,
>>> including register space and interrupts. Clocks, reset, and power domain
>>> information is SoC specific.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/gpu/img,powervr-sgx.yaml         | 124 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
>>>   2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-sgx.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-sgx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-sgx.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000000..bb821e1184de9
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-sgx.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +# Copyright (c) 2023 Imagination Technologies Ltd.
>>
>> Your email has @TI domain, are you sure you attribute your copyrights to
>> Imagination?
>>
> 
> The file started as a copy/paste from a IMG copyrighted file, even
> though it is now almost completely re-written I've left their (c)
> for good measure. I'll add an additional TI (c).
> 
>> ...
>>
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clocks: true
>>
>> Missing min/maxItems
>>
> 
> These are set in the allOf/if/then blocks below, seems

I know, but we expect them here.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,exynos7-clock.yaml#L57

> if I don't set them to at least something here then I get
> a warning:
> 
>     'clock-names', 'clocks' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> even if I define them in the allOf block below. I don't
> know what the min/max should be until I check the compatible
> in the allOf block.

As always: the widest constraints.


...

> Logic in YAML always seems messy to me, here it is in pseudo C:
> 
> if (compatible == allwinner,sun6i-a31-gpu ||
>      compatible == ingenic,jz4780-gpu) {
> 	if (compatible == allwinner,sun6i-a31-gpu)
> 		clocks: ...
> 	if (compatible == ingenic,jz4780-gpu)
> 		clocks: ...
> 	required:
> 		- clocks
> 		- clock-names
> } else { /* disallow for all others */
> 	properties:
> 		clocks: false
> 		clock-names: false
> }

OK, I see, that's the limitation of YAML. The point is that this code is
not readable, so just list all fallbacks or variants.



Best regards,
Krzysztof