[PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: stmmac: Enable Per DMA Channel interrupt

[Swee, Leong Ching]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 5:24 AM
> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>; Swee, Leong
> Ching <leong.ching.swee at intel.com>; David S. Miller
> <davem at davemloft.net>
> Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf at kernel.org; mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com;
> alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com; joabreu at synopsys.com;
> davem at davemloft.net; edumazet at google.com; kuba at kernel.org;
> pabeni at redhat.com; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org; conor+dt at kernel.org;
> peppe.cavallaro at st.com; linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> netdev at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: stmmac: Enable Per DMA Channel
> interrupt
> 
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 07/01/2024 17:40, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf at kernel.org wrote:
> > > Hello:
> > >
> > > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by David S.
> > > Miller <davem at davemloft.net>:
> > >
> > > On Fri,  5 Jan 2024 15:09:21 +0800 you wrote:
> > >> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee at intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >> Add Per DMA Channel interrupt feature for DWXGMAC IP.
> > >>
> > >> Patchset (link below) contains per DMA channel interrupt, But it
> > >> was achieved.
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230821203328.GA2197059-
> > >> robh at kernel.org/t/#m849b529a642e1bff89c05a07efc25d6a94c8bfb4
> > >>
> > >> [...]
> > >
> > > Here is the summary with links:
> > >   - [net-next,v2,1/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: per channel irq
> > >     https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/67d47c8ada0f
> >
> > Please wait for DT bindings review a bit more than one working day (I
> > don't count Saturday and Sunday, because we all have some life...).
> 
> +1. Would be very nice to have some more time to review the rest of
> the bits too. This would be specifically important for the STMMAC driver
> which doesn't currently have active maintainer. What about 5-10 work days
> to make sure that no comment would be submitted? Besides I thought that
> no features were supposed to be submitted during the merge window. Are
> we over the merge window already? (I might have lost track of time on the
> holidays.)
> 
> Leong, next time before re-submitting your patchsets please wait for some
> more time than just two days. I waited for your response for almost two
> weeks.
> 
> -Serge(y)
> 
Sorry for that, will wait 5-10 days before resubmitting v3 patches.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
> >