[PATCH v3 00/14] arm64: dts: imx8mm-kontron: DT updates

Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf at kontron.de
Mon Jan 8 00:54:14 PST 2024


On 19.12.23 16:14, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 13.12.23 10:31, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 03:41:03PM +0100, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
>> ...
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |   4 +
>>>  .../dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-bl-osm-s.dts | 295 +++------
>>>  .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-bl.dts  | 198 +++++-
>>>  .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-dl.dtso | 201 +++++++
>>>  .../dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi   | 567 +++++++++++++++++-
>>>  .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-sl.dtsi |   4 +-
>>>  6 files changed, 1035 insertions(+), 234 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-dl.dtso
>>
>> A couple of things:
>>
>> - I have to use 'git am -3' apply some of the patches.  Could you rebase
>>   the series on imx/dt64 branch?
> 
> Ok, sure!
> 
>>
>> - There are a few DTC warnings that need to be addressed.
>>
>> ../arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-bl.dts:235.34-238.7: Warning (graph_endpoint): /soc at 0/bus at 30800000/i2c at 30a40000/bridge at 2c/ports/port at 0/endpoint: graph connection to node '/soc at 0/bus at 32c00000/dsi at 32e10000/ports/port at 1/endpoint' is not bidirectional
> 
> I'm not aware of a proper solution for this warning. The thing is that
> there is a DSI switch on the board that is able to route the DSI output
> of the SoC to one of two bridges (HDMI or LVDS).
> 
> On the driver side there is no representation of the switch. Therefore
> the result is a three-way connection for the graph ports which is
> reported by the binding check, but works fine as we only enable one of
> the target port nodes at a time and use GPIO hogs to select the switch path.
> 
> Rob, Krzystztof: Would it be acceptable to ignore this until there is a
> way to represent this in the DT? Are there alternative solutions? Is
> there anything to model a graph link switch?
> 
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-dl.dtbo: Warning (graph_port): /fragment at 3: graph port node name should be 'port'
>> ../arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-dl.dtso:61.17-63.3: Warning (graph_endpoint): /fragment at 3/__overlay__: graph endpoint node name should be 'endpoint'
> 
> For these warnings it seems like I could work around them by creating
> two separate port nodes in the board DT and then only enable the proper
> one in the overlay.

Until I find out how to deal with the DTC warnings above, I sent a v4
without the display support patches to unblock the merging of the other
patches.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list