[PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: stmmac: Enable Per DMA Channel interrupt

[Serge Semin]

On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/01/2024 17:40, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf at kernel.org wrote:
> > Hello:
> > 
> > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> > by David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>:
> > 
> > On Fri,  5 Jan 2024 15:09:21 +0800 you wrote:
> >> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee at intel.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Add Per DMA Channel interrupt feature for DWXGMAC IP.
> >>
> >> Patchset (link below) contains per DMA channel interrupt, But it was
> >> achieved.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230821203328.GA2197059-
> >> robh at kernel.org/t/#m849b529a642e1bff89c05a07efc25d6a94c8bfb4
> >>
> >> [...]
> > 
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - [net-next,v2,1/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: per channel irq
> >     https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/67d47c8ada0f
> 
> Please wait for DT bindings review a bit more than one working day (I
> don't count Saturday and Sunday, because we all have some life...).

+1. Would be very nice to have some more time to review the rest of
the bits too. This would be specifically important for the STMMAC
driver which doesn't currently have active maintainer. What about 5-10
work days to make sure that no comment would be submitted? Besides I
thought that no features were supposed to be submitted during the
merge window. Are we over the merge window already? (I might have lost
track of time on the holidays.)

Leong, next time before re-submitting your patchsets please wait for
some more time than just two days. I waited for your response for
almost two weeks.

-Serge(y)

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>