[PATCH v2 1/2] clk: mediatek: Introduce need_pm_runtime to mtk_clk_desc

Pin-yen Lin treapking at chromium.org
Fri Jan 5 00:39:55 PST 2024


On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:51 PM Pin-yen Lin <treapking at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Eugen and Angelo,
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have a way to reliably reproduce this either.
>
> We notice this issue from the automatic crash reports sent from the
> users, but we are still not able to reproduce this locally.  So our
> plan is to ship this patch to the users and see if the crash rate goes
> down after a month or so.
>
> Regards,
> Pin-yen
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:20 PM Eugen Hristev
> <eugen.hristev at collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/3/24 14:19, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > Il 02/01/24 09:12, Pin-yen Lin ha scritto:
> > >> Introduce a new need_pm_runtime variable to mtk_clk_desc to indicate
> > >> this clock needs a runtime PM get on the clock controller during the
> > >> probing stage.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking at chromium.org>
> > >
> > > Hello Pin-yen,
> > >
> > > We have experienced something similar, but it was really hard to reproduce after
> > > some changes.
> > >
> > > In an effort to try to solve this issue (but again, reproducing is really hard),
> > > Eugen has sent a commit in the hope that someone else found a way to easily
> > > reproduce. Please look at [1].
> > >
> > > I'm also adding Eugen to the Cc's of this email.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Angelo
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20231225133615.78993-1-eugen.hristev@collabora.com/
> >
> > Hello Pin-yen,
> >
> > Can you try my patch and let me know if this changes anything for you ?
> >
> > If it does not change anything, can you also try this one as well ? It's another
> > attempt to fix the synchronization with genpd.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231129113120.4907-1-eugen.hristev@collabora.com/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eugen

Hi Eugen and Angelo,

After the offline discussion with Chen-yu, we think this series is
solving a different issue from the patches you mentioned. This one is
trying to resolve a deadlock in the probe stage, and more details can
be found in the commit message of the next patch. The referenced
patches seem to be fixing other race conditions on powering on/off the
power domain. Sorry for adding the wrong commit message and maybe
leading to incorrect understanding on this series.

By the way, sorry for the top posting in the previous mail.

Regards,
Pin-yen
> >
> > >
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> Changes in v2:
> > >> - Fix the order of error handling
> > >> - Update the commit message and add a comment before the runtime PM call
> > >>
> > >>   drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >>   drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h |  2 ++
> > >>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
> > >> index 2e55368dc4d8..c31e535909c8 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
> > >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > >>   #include <linux/of.h>
> > >>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > >>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > >> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > >>   #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >>
> > >>   #include "clk-mtk.h"
> > >> @@ -494,6 +495,14 @@ static int __mtk_clk_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > >>                      return IS_ERR(base) ? PTR_ERR(base) : -ENOMEM;
> > >>      }
> > >>
> > >> +
> > >> +    if (mcd->need_runtime_pm) {
> > >> +            devm_pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > >> +            r = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
> > >> +            if (r)
> > >> +                    return r;
> > >> +    }
> > >> +
> > >>      /* Calculate how many clk_hw_onecell_data entries to allocate */
> > >>      num_clks = mcd->num_clks + mcd->num_composite_clks;
> > >>      num_clks += mcd->num_fixed_clks + mcd->num_factor_clks;
> > >> @@ -574,6 +583,9 @@ static int __mtk_clk_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > >>                      goto unregister_clks;
> > >>      }
> > >>
> > >> +    if (mcd->need_runtime_pm)
> > >> +            pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> > >> +
> > >>      return r;
> > >>
> > >>   unregister_clks:
> > >> @@ -604,6 +616,9 @@ static int __mtk_clk_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > >>   free_base:
> > >>      if (mcd->shared_io && base)
> > >>              iounmap(base);
> > >> +
> > >> +    if (mcd->need_runtime_pm)
> > >> +            pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> > >>      return r;
> > >>   }
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h
> > >> index 22096501a60a..c17fe1c2d732 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h
> > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h
> > >> @@ -237,6 +237,8 @@ struct mtk_clk_desc {
> > >>
> > >>      int (*clk_notifier_func)(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk);
> > >>      unsigned int mfg_clk_idx;
> > >> +
> > >> +    bool need_runtime_pm;
> > >>   };
> > >>
> > >>   int mtk_clk_pdev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list