[PATCH 0/2] Fix per-policy boost behavior
Jie Zhan
zhanjie9 at hisilicon.com
Tue Feb 27 18:06:17 PST 2024
Hi Sibi,
Thanks for pointing this issue out.
However, I can't clearly see how the existing code fails.
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() checks cpufreq_boost_enabled(),
and that should be already set in cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() before
calling cpufreq_boost_set_sw(), so presumably cpufreq_boost_set_sw()
is supposed to work as expected.
Can you explain this a bit further?
Cheers,
Jie
On 28/02/2024 00:53, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Fix per-policy boost behavior by incorporating per-policy boost flag
> in the policy->max calculation and setting the correct per-policy
> boost_enabled value on devices that use cpufreq_enable_boost_support().
>
> Logs reported-by Dietmar Eggemann [1]:
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/265e5f2c-9b45-420f-89b1-44369aeb8418@arm.com/
>
> Sibi Sankar (2):
> cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on SoCs using
> cpufreq_boost_set_sw
> cpufreq: apple-soc: Align per-policy and global boost flags
>
> drivers/cpufreq/apple-soc-cpufreq.c | 1 +
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 +++++++++------
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list