[PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: Improve comment in contpte_ptep_get_lockless()
Ryan Roberts
ryan.roberts at arm.com
Mon Feb 26 04:37:29 PST 2024
On 26/02/2024 12:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.02.24 13:03, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Make clear the atmicity/consistency requirements of the API and how we
>> achieve them.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Zc-Tqqfksho3BHmU@arm.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
>> index be0a226c4ff9..1b64b4c3f8bf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
>> @@ -183,16 +183,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(contpte_ptep_get);
>> pte_t contpte_ptep_get_lockless(pte_t *orig_ptep)
>> {
>> /*
>> - * Gather access/dirty bits, which may be populated in any of the ptes
>> - * of the contig range. We may not be holding the PTL, so any contiguous
>> - * range may be unfolded/modified/refolded under our feet. Therefore we
>> - * ensure we read a _consistent_ contpte range by checking that all ptes
>> - * in the range are valid and have CONT_PTE set, that all pfns are
>> - * contiguous and that all pgprots are the same (ignoring access/dirty).
>> - * If we find a pte that is not consistent, then we must be racing with
>> - * an update so start again. If the target pte does not have CONT_PTE
>> - * set then that is considered consistent on its own because it is not
>> - * part of a contpte range.
>> + * The ptep_get_lockless() API requires us to read and return *orig_ptep
>> + * so that it is self-consistent, without the PTL held, so we may be
>> + * racing with other threads modifying the pte. Usually a READ_ONCE()
>> + * would suffice, but for the contpte case, we also need to gather the
>> + * access and dirty bits from across all ptes in the contiguous block,
>> + * and we can't read all of those neighbouring ptes atomically, so any
>> + * contiguous range may be unfolded/modified/refolded under our feet.
>> + * Therefore we ensure we read a _consistent_ contpte range by checking
>> + * that all ptes in the range are valid and have CONT_PTE set, that all
>> + * pfns are contiguous and that all pgprots are the same (ignoring
>> + * access/dirty). If we find a pte that is not consistent, then we must
>> + * be racing with an update so start again. If the target pte does not
>> + * have CONT_PTE set then that is considered consistent on its own
>> + * because it is not part of a contpte range.
>> */
>> pgprot_t orig_prot;
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
Thanks!
>
> In an ideal world, we'd really not rely on any accessed/dirty on the lockless
> path and remove contpte_ptep_get_lockless() completely :)
Not sure if you saw my RFC to do exactly that? (well, it doesn't actually remove
[contpte_]ptep_get_lockless() but it does remove all the callers). If you have
any feedback, we could get this moving...
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240215121756.2734131-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
Thanks,
Ryan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list