[PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: Improve comment in contpte_ptep_get_lockless()

[Ryan Roberts]

Make clear the atmicity/consistency requirements of the API and how we
achieve them.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Zc-Tqqfksho3BHmU@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
index be0a226c4ff9..1b64b4c3f8bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
@@ -183,16 +183,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(contpte_ptep_get);
 pte_t contpte_ptep_get_lockless(pte_t *orig_ptep)
 {
 	/*
-	 * Gather access/dirty bits, which may be populated in any of the ptes
-	 * of the contig range. We may not be holding the PTL, so any contiguous
-	 * range may be unfolded/modified/refolded under our feet. Therefore we
-	 * ensure we read a _consistent_ contpte range by checking that all ptes
-	 * in the range are valid and have CONT_PTE set, that all pfns are
-	 * contiguous and that all pgprots are the same (ignoring access/dirty).
-	 * If we find a pte that is not consistent, then we must be racing with
-	 * an update so start again. If the target pte does not have CONT_PTE
-	 * set then that is considered consistent on its own because it is not
-	 * part of a contpte range.
+	 * The ptep_get_lockless() API requires us to read and return *orig_ptep
+	 * so that it is self-consistent, without the PTL held, so we may be
+	 * racing with other threads modifying the pte. Usually a READ_ONCE()
+	 * would suffice, but for the contpte case, we also need to gather the
+	 * access and dirty bits from across all ptes in the contiguous block,
+	 * and we can't read all of those neighbouring ptes atomically, so any
+	 * contiguous range may be unfolded/modified/refolded under our feet.
+	 * Therefore we ensure we read a _consistent_ contpte range by checking
+	 * that all ptes in the range are valid and have CONT_PTE set, that all
+	 * pfns are contiguous and that all pgprots are the same (ignoring
+	 * access/dirty). If we find a pte that is not consistent, then we must
+	 * be racing with an update so start again. If the target pte does not
+	 * have CONT_PTE set then that is considered consistent on its own
+	 * because it is not part of a contpte range.
 	 */
 
 	pgprot_t orig_prot;
-- 
2.25.1