(subset) [linux][PATCH v6 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Thu Feb 22 15:21:18 PST 2024


On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:30:38AM +0000, Dharma.B at microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> 
> On 20/02/24 1:50 pm, Lee Jones wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dharma.B at microchip.com wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>
> >> On 12/02/24 3:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>>
> >>> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 05:47:33 +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> >>>>> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Align clocks and clock-names properties to clearly indicate that the LCD
> >>>>> controller expects lvds_pll_clk when interfaced with the lvds display. This
> >>>>> alignment with the specific hardware requirements ensures accurate device tree
> >>>>> configuration for systems utilizing the HLCDC IP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [...]
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format
> >>>>         commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Next is still failing.
> >>>
> >>> Dharma,
> >>> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches.
> >>
> >> I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by the oversight. I have
> >> organized the patches according to their dependencies in the patch
> >> series, but unfortunately, I neglected to explicitly mention these
> >> dependencies. I understand the importance of clear communication in our
> >> collaborative efforts. Please feel free to provide guidance on how I can
> >> assist you further in resolving this matter.
> > 
> > If this continues to be an issue, I can just remove the commit.
> 
> There won't be any issue if both pwm and display binding goes before the 
> mfd binding.
> 
> Could you please pick the display binding as well?

As this is still not resolved, I've applied the display binding. Not 
ideal, but should fix next.

Rob



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list