[PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for NXP S32G boards

Ghennadi Procopciuc ghennadi.procopciuc at oss.nxp.com
Wed Feb 21 07:19:01 PST 2024


On 2/21/24 16:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/02/2024 15:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/02/2024 13:01, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote:
>>> From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc at nxp.com>
>>>
>>> Add myself as a maintainer of the NXP S32G DT files.
>>
>> No need for cover letters for single patches. OTOH, this commit msg is
>> empty...
Thank you, I can correct that.

>> Plus your patch looks corrupted (wrong encoding): F??rber

Indeed, it is due to 'Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"'.
I can fix this as part of v2.

>> BTW, did you contribute anything to the upstream Linux kernel? Do you
>> know the process? Downstream does not really matter.
> 
> I found the answer:
> 
> From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc at nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc at oss.nxp.com>
> 
> Does not look like. Please get some upstream work experience first.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Aghennadi.procopciuc%40oss.nxp.com

Although I am new to upstream communities and may make mistakes, I am
eager to learn and improve.

After leaving SuSe[0], the current maintainer of the NXP S32G DT files
became inactive[1]. As a result, this area is not currently being
maintained. This is the actual reason why I attempted to add myself as a
maintainer of that area. Although I acknowledge that I may not have
enough experience to become a maintainer, I am concerned that the NXP
S32G DT patch submission may be blocked for everyone due to the current
situation.

Should someone else from MAINTAINERS take over this area, or are there
other alternatives?

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231115234508.11510-1-clin@suse.com/
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a7a55dc6-c204-4aad-adff-9806d3302b6b@oss.nxp.com/


> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> Regards,
Ghennadi




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list