[PATCH v6 0/4] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU

[Peng Fan]

Hi Jassi,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU
> 
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 8:10 PM Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jassi,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU
> > >
> > > Hi Peng,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 7:38 PM Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jassi
> > > >
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v6 0/4] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU
> > > > >
> > > > > - Add dt-bindings
> > > > > - i.MX95 ELE/V2X use same register layout as i.MX8ULP S4 MU, but
> > > > >   the TR/RR num is different. To make code reusable and not add
> > > > > too
> > > much
> > > > >   macros, add runtime detect number of TR and RR by reading
> PAR_OFF
> > > > >   registers.
> > > > > - Add i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU entry in driver
> > > >
> > > > Ping..
> > > >
> > > dt bindings and compatibles first need to be acked by dt maintainers.
> >
> > The bindings has been reviewed by Conor Dooley who listed as maintainer:
> > OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
> > M:      Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > M:      Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>
> > M:      Conor Dooley <conor+dt at kernel.org>
> >
> Ok, I didn't realise we have three maintainers now.
> 
> I see no problem other than adding of_platform_populate() and compatibles
> in the same patch. They should be separate.

Just posted out V7 to address this, please have a look.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> cheers.