[RESEND PATCH v1 05/13] mfd: tps6594-spi: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC SPI

[Kevin Hilman]

Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r at ltts.com> writes:

> Add support for TPS65224 PMIC in the TPS6594 driver as they share
> significant functional overlap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r at ltts.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/tps6594-spi.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps6594-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/tps6594-spi.c
> index 5afb1736f..7ec66d31b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps6594-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps6594-spi.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  /*
> - * SPI access driver for TI TPS6594/TPS6593/LP8764 PMICs
> + * SPI access driver for TI TPS65224/TPS6594/TPS6593/LP8764 PMICs
>   *
>   * Copyright (C) 2023 BayLibre Incorporated - https://www.baylibre.com/
>   */
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int tps6594_spi_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int v
>  	return spi_write(spi, buf, count);
>  }
>  
> -static const struct regmap_config tps6594_spi_regmap_config = {
> +static struct regmap_config tps6594_spi_regmap_config = {
>  	.reg_bits = 16,
>  	.val_bits = 8,
>  	.max_register = TPS6594_REG_DWD_FAIL_CNT_REG,
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id tps6594_spi_of_match_table[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,tps6594-q1", .data = (void *)TPS6594, },
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,tps6593-q1", .data = (void *)TPS6593, },
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,lp8764-q1",  .data = (void *)LP8764,  },
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,tps65224-q1", .data = (void *)TPS65224, },
>  	{}
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tps6594_spi_of_match_table);
> @@ -101,15 +102,18 @@ static int tps6594_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	tps->reg = spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0);
>  	tps->irq = spi->irq;
>  
> -	tps->regmap = devm_regmap_init(dev, NULL, spi, &tps6594_spi_regmap_config);
> -	if (IS_ERR(tps->regmap))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(tps->regmap), "Failed to init regmap\n");
> -
>  	match = of_match_device(tps6594_spi_of_match_table, dev);
>  	if (!match)
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to find matching chip ID\n");
>  	tps->chip_id = (unsigned long)match->data;
>  
> +	if (tps->chip_id == TPS65224)
> +		tps6594_spi_regmap_config.volatile_table = &tps65224_volatile_table;

Similar to my comment on the i2c series, but to be more specific:

Rather than use the .data pointer in the of_match_table as simply a
chip_id, instead make that into a struct that can contain chip-specific
values/pointers etc, and then each compatible can have a custom struct
(if needed.)

This way, at probe/match time, all the chip-specific data is setup using
that struct, so that at runtime, there doesn't need to be any "if
(chip_id)" checking.

Kevin