[PATCH 5/5] iio: adc: ad7380: use spi_optimize_message()
David Lechner
dlechner at baylibre.com
Tue Feb 13 07:27:58 PST 2024
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:47 AM Nuno Sá <noname.nuno at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 17:26 -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> > This modifies the ad7380 ADC driver to use spi_optimize_message() to
> > optimize the SPI message for the buffered read operation. Since buffered
> > reads reuse the same SPI message for each read, this can improve
> > performance by reducing the overhead of setting up some parts the SPI
> > message in each spi_sync() call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner at baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > -
> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c
> > index abd746aef868..5c5d2642a474 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c
> > @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct ad7380_state {
> > struct spi_device *spi;
> > struct regulator *vref;
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > + struct spi_message *msg;
> > /*
> > * DMA (thus cache coherency maintenance) requires the
> > * transfer buffers to live in their own cache lines.
> > @@ -231,19 +232,55 @@ static int ad7380_debugfs_reg_access(struct iio_dev
> > *indio_dev, u32 reg,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int ad7380_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct ad7380_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + struct spi_transfer *xfer;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + st->msg = spi_message_alloc(1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!st->msg)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + xfer = list_first_entry(&st->msg->transfers, struct spi_transfer,
> > + transfer_list);
> > +
> > + xfer->bits_per_word = st->chip_info->channels[0].scan_type.realbits;
> > + xfer->len = 4;
> > + xfer->rx_buf = st->scan_data.raw;
> > +
> > + ret = spi_optimize_message(st->spi, st->msg);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + spi_message_free(st->msg);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ad7380_buffer_postdisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct ad7380_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > + spi_unoptimize_message(st->msg);
> > + spi_message_free(st->msg);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Not such a big deal but unless I'm missing something we could have the
> spi_message (+ the transfer) statically allocated in struct ad7380_state and do
> the optimize only once at probe (naturally with proper devm action for
> unoptimize). Then we would not need to this for every buffer enable + disable. I
> know in terms of performance it won't matter but it would be less code I guess.
>
> Am I missing something?
No, your understanding is correct for the current state of everything
in this series. So, we could do as you suggest, but I have a feeling
that future additions to this driver might require that it gets
changed back this way eventually.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list