[PATCH v9 05/16] PCI: imx6: Using "linux,pci-domain" as slot ID

[Frank Li]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 07:53:24PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:25:58AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 01:12:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > "PCI: imx6: Use "linux,pci-domain" as slot ID"
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > Avoid use get slot id by compared with register physical address. If there
> > > > are more than 2 slots, compared logic will become complex.
> > > > 
> > > > "linux,pci-domain" already exist at dts since commit:
> > > > 	commit (c0b70f05c87f3b arm64: dts: imx8mq: use_dt_domains for pci node).
> > > > 
> > > > So it is safe to remove compare basic address code:
> > > > 	...
> > > > 	if (dbi_base->start == IMX8MQ_PCIE2_BASE_ADDR)
> > > > 		imx6_pcie->controller_id = 1;
> > > 
> > > No it is not unless you magically update all firmware out
> > > there in the field.
> > 
> > commit c0b70f05c87f3b09b391027c6f056d0facf331ef
> > Author:     Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > AuthorDate: Fri Jan 15 11:26:57 2021 +0800
> > Commit:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
> > CommitDate: Fri Jan 29 14:46:28 2021 +0800
> > 
> > I am not sure if it is neccesary to compatible with 2 years ago's dts.
> > I think it may not boot at all with using 2 year agao dtb file directly.
> > 
> > Do you have other comments? I can remove it from this big patch series,
> 
> I will have a look at the full series first we can decide whether
> to drop it later.
> 
> I am travelling so I am not sure I can review it before February
> 12th, FYI.

Okay, I send v10 at
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/Zb06JL5X8EiHEyFD@lpieralisi/raw
which removed "linux,pci-domain" patches.

If you have more comments, please comment at v10 version.

Frank


> 
> Lorenzo