[PATCH v9 05/16] PCI: imx6: Using "linux,pci-domain" as slot ID

[Frank Li]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:54:31PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > Avoid use get slot id by compared with register physical address. If there
> > are more than 2 slots, compared logic will become complex.
> > 
> > "linux,pci-domain" already exist at dts since commit:
> > 	commit (c0b70f05c87f3b arm64: dts: imx8mq: use_dt_domains for pci node).
> > 
> > So it is safe to remove compare basic address code:
> > 	...
> > 	if (dbi_base->start == IMX8MQ_PCIE2_BASE_ADDR)
> > 		imx6_pcie->controller_id = 1;
> > 	...
> 
> I have no idea what this is telling me.  I guess you don't want to use
> IMX8MQ_PCIE2_BASE_ADDR to decide something?  That much sounds good:
> the *address* of some MMIO space doesn't tell us anything about the
> function of that space.

You are right. If there are more than two controller. The check logic
will be extremely complex.

There are some discussin at below thread about linux,pci-domain
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20231206165953.GA717921@bhelgaas/

https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20231217175158.GF6748@thinkpad/

> 
> I expect the "compatible" string to tell the driver what the
> programming model of the device is.
> 
> > +	/* Using linux,pci-domain as PCI slot id */
> > +	imx6_pcie->controller_id = of_get_pci_domain_nr(node);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there are no "linux,pci-domain" property specified in DT, then assume only one
> > +	 * controller is available.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (imx6_pcie->controller_id == -EINVAL)
> > +		imx6_pcie->controller_id = 0;
> > +	else if (imx6_pcie->controller_id < 0)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, imx6_pcie->controller_id,
> > +				     "linux,pci-domain have wrong value\n");
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something here.  It looks like this driver uses
> controller_id to distinguish between hardware variants or maybe
> between two Root Ports (slots?) in the same SoC?

Yes!

> 
>   imx6_pcie_grp_offset
>     return imx6_pcie->controller_id == 1 ? IOMUXC_GPR16 : IOMUXC_GPR14;
> 
>   imx6_pcie_configure_type
>     id = imx6_pcie->controller_id
>     if (!drvdata->mode_mask[id])         # <-- looks unsafe

I can add safe check here.

>       id = 0;
>     regmap_update_bits(drvdata->mode_off[id], ...)
> 
> (This "mode_mask[id]" looks like it will reference garbage if the DT
> supplies "linux,pci-domain = <2>".  A bogus DT shouldn't be able to
> cause a driver to misbehave like that.)

Suppose I can use dt-bind doc to force to 0,1 and safe check here.

> 
> That doesn't seem related to "linux,pci-domain" at all.

I added comments about
/* Using linux,pci-domain as PCI slot id */

We may add new property about controller-id, but there already have common
one "linux,pci-domain", which value in upstreamed dts exactly match our
expection, I also found other platform use it as slot id in kernel tree.

Any way, we can continue discuss the better solution here. But I hope
it was not block whole 16 patches. we can skip this one firstly.

I still have more than 10 clean up patches my local tree.

> 
> Bjorn