[EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] dt-bindings: usb: ci-hdrc-usb2: add restrictions for reg, interrupts, clock and clock-names properties
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Fri Feb 2 03:07:06 PST 2024
On 02/02/2024 10:10, Xu Yang wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>>
>> On 31/01/2024 12:43, Xu Yang wrote:
>>> Change reg, interrupts, clock and clock-names as common properties and add
>>> restrictions on them for different compatibles.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2 at nxp.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - new patch since v3's discussion
>>> - split the reg, interrupts, clock and clock-names properties into
>>> common part and device-specific
>>> Changes in v5:
>>> - keep common property unchanged
>>> - make if-then more readable
>>> - remove non imx part
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.yaml | 118 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-
>> hdrc-usb2.yaml
>>> index 3b56e0edb1c6..6ad3582051b8 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.yaml
>>> @@ -412,6 +412,124 @@ allOf:
>>> samsung,picophy-pre-emp-curr-control: false
>>> samsung,picophy-dc-vol-level-adjust: false
>>>
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: fsl,imx27-usb
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + clocks:
>>> + minItems: 3
>>> + maxItems: 3
>>> + clock-names:
>>> + minItems: 3
>>> + maxItems: 3
>>> + items:
>>> + anyOf:
>>> + - const: ipg
>>> + - const: ahb
>>> + - const: per
>>
>> This would be just: enum: [ipg, ahb, per], but in both cases I question
>> why the order should be flexible? Nothing in commit msg explains it.
>
> The driver will get the clock by clock-name, then the order should not
> matter. However, these three clock-names should be present at the same
> time. I should use enum then.
Forgot to answer to this.
Which driver? U-boot? OpenBSD? The one in my custom Linux kernel fork
(open-source and published on github)? Did you check all of them?
The order should be strict (or "fixed" as in non-flexible), unless there
is some reason against. If one driver does not care about order, is not
the reason.
This comment applies to all bindings so to all your future
contributions. I really keep repeating it...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list