[PATCH v1 07/14] perf arm-spe/cs-etm: Directly iterate CPU maps
James Clark
james.clark at arm.com
Thu Feb 1 03:06:47 PST 2024
On 01/02/2024 02:12, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM James Clark <james.clark at arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/2023 14:17, James Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29/11/2023 06:02, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>> Rather than iterate all CPUs and see if they are in CPU maps, directly
>>>> iterate the CPU map. Similarly make use of the intersect
>>>> function. Switch perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty to more
>>>> appropriate alternatives.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers at google.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 77 ++++++++++++----------------
>>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 4 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
>>>> index 77e6663c1703..a68a72f2f668 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
>>>> @@ -197,38 +197,32 @@ static int cs_etm_validate_timestamp(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> static int cs_etm_validate_config(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> struct evsel *evsel)
>>>> {
>>>> - int i, err = -EINVAL;
>>>> + int idx, err = -EINVAL;
>>>> struct perf_cpu_map *event_cpus = evsel->evlist->core.user_requested_cpus;
>>>> struct perf_cpu_map *online_cpus = perf_cpu_map__new_online_cpus();
>>>> + struct perf_cpu_map *intersect_cpus = perf_cpu_map__intersect(event_cpus, online_cpus);
>>>> + struct perf_cpu cpu;
>>>>
>>>> - /* Set option of each CPU we have */
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
>>>> - struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
>>>> -
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * In per-cpu case, do the validation for CPUs to work with.
>>>> - * In per-thread case, the CPU map is empty. Since the traced
>>>> - * program can run on any CPUs in this case, thus don't skip
>>>> - * validation.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(event_cpus) &&
>>>> - !perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu))
>>>> - continue;
>>>
>>> This has broken validation for per-thread sessions.
>>> perf_cpu_map__intersect() doesn't seem to be able to handle the case
>>> where an 'any' map intersected with an online map should return the
>>> online map. Or at least it should for this to work, and it seems to make
>>> sense for it to work that way.
>>>
>>> At least that was my initial impression, but I only debugged it and saw
>>> that the loop is now skipped entirely.
>>>
>>>> -
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
>>>> - continue;
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__put(online_cpus);
>>>>
>>>> - err = cs_etm_validate_context_id(itr, evsel, i);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Set option of each CPU we have. In per-cpu case, do the validation
>>>> + * for CPUs to work with. In per-thread case, the CPU map is empty.
>>>> + * Since the traced program can run on any CPUs in this case, thus don't
>>>> + * skip validation.
>>>> + */
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu_skip_any(cpu, idx, intersect_cpus) {
>>>> + err = cs_etm_validate_context_id(itr, evsel, cpu.cpu);
>>>> if (err)
>>>> goto out;
>>>> - err = cs_etm_validate_timestamp(itr, evsel, i);
>>>> + err = cs_etm_validate_timestamp(itr, evsel, idx);
>
> I think this is an error, idx shouldn't be used here, cpu.cpu should.
>
Yes I think you're right. But when I tested this it was on a machine
with all CPUs online, and all traced, so I think idx == cpu.cpu. So
although this might need to be fixed it didn't cause the breakage.
Also this line of code was also never hit because the issue was the
intersect returning an empty map before here.
>>>> if (err)
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> err = 0;
>>>> out:
>>>> - perf_cpu_map__put(online_cpus);
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__put(intersect_cpus);
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -435,7 +429,7 @@ static int cs_etm_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> * Also the case of per-cpu mmaps, need the contextID in order to be notified
>>>> * when a context switch happened.
>>>> */
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus)) {
>>>> + if (!perf_cpu_map__is_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus)) {
>>>> evsel__set_config_if_unset(cs_etm_pmu, cs_etm_evsel,
>>>> "timestamp", 1);
>>>> evsel__set_config_if_unset(cs_etm_pmu, cs_etm_evsel,
>>>> @@ -461,7 +455,7 @@ static int cs_etm_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> evsel->core.attr.sample_period = 1;
>>>>
>>>> /* In per-cpu case, always need the time of mmap events etc */
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus))
>>>> + if (!perf_cpu_map__is_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus))
>>>> evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, TIME);
>>>>
>>>> err = cs_etm_validate_config(itr, cs_etm_evsel);
>>>> @@ -533,38 +527,32 @@ static size_t
>>>> cs_etm_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
>>>> struct evlist *evlist __maybe_unused)
>>>> {
>>>> - int i;
>>>> + int idx;
>>>> int etmv3 = 0, etmv4 = 0, ete = 0;
>>>> struct perf_cpu_map *event_cpus = evlist->core.user_requested_cpus;
>>>> struct perf_cpu_map *online_cpus = perf_cpu_map__new_online_cpus();
>>>> + struct perf_cpu cpu;
>>>>
>>>> /* cpu map is not empty, we have specific CPUs to work with */
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(event_cpus)) {
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
>>>> - struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
>>>> -
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) ||
>>>> - !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
>>>> - continue;
>>>> + if (!perf_cpu_map__is_empty(event_cpus)) {
>>>> + struct perf_cpu_map *intersect_cpus =
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__intersect(event_cpus, online_cpus);
>>>>
>>>> - if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, i))
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu_skip_any(cpu, idx, intersect_cpus) {
>>>> + if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, cpu.cpu))
>>
>> Similar problem here. For a per-thread session, the CPU map is not empty
>> (it's an 'any' map, presumably length 1), so it comes into this first
>> if, rather than the else below which is for the 'any' scenario.
>>
>> Then the intersect with online CPUs results in an empty map, so no CPU
>> metadata is recorded, then the session fails.
>>
>> If you made the intersect work in the way I mentioned above we could
>> also delete the else below, because that's just another way to convert
>> from 'any' to 'all online'.
>
> I don't think intersect of "all online" with an "any CPU" should
> return "all online" as these would be quite different options to
> perf_event_open. Let's see if the issue above fixes this change
> otherwise I can revert it to a more mechanical translation of the
> existing code into the new APIs.
>
If you're not ok with the intersection behavior that I suggested, then
maybe we need a new function like perf_cpu_map__flatten() or
perf_cpu_map__expand() which can be used in these two cases which does
behave in that way. It doesn't look like it needs any more re-writing,
it's just the perf_cpu_map__intersect() needs to behave slightly
differently in this case.
It's because ETM cares about validating and saving the configuration
per-core, even if you finally open the event with CPU==-1, because later
we'll need all that info to decode the trace.
Although I can't see what scenario that you wouldn't want ('any'
intersect '1,2') == '1,2'. Is there any code in Perf that's already
doing that that would be broken by that change? It might be best to have
that behavior earlier rather than later in case something does start
depending on it.
As far as I know you can't do both per-thread and per-cpu sessions in
Perf, so it doesn't really matter how the intersection behaves in that
scenario.
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>>>> ete++;
>>>> - else if (cs_etm_is_etmv4(itr, i))
>>>> + else if (cs_etm_is_etmv4(itr, cpu.cpu))
>>>> etmv4++;
>>>> else
>>>> etmv3++;
>>>> }
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__put(intersect_cpus);
>>>> } else {
>>>> /* get configuration for all CPUs in the system */
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
>>>> - struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
>>>> -
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
>>>> - continue;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, i))
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, idx, online_cpus) {
>>>> + if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, cpu.cpu))
>>>> ete++;
>>>> - else if (cs_etm_is_etmv4(itr, i))
>>>> + else if (cs_etm_is_etmv4(itr, cpu.cpu))
>>>> etmv4++;
>>>> else
>>>> etmv3++;
>>>> @@ -814,15 +802,14 @@ static int cs_etm_info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> /* If the cpu_map is empty all online CPUs are involved */
>>>> - if (perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(event_cpus)) {
>>>> + if (perf_cpu_map__is_empty(event_cpus)) {
>>>> cpu_map = online_cpus;
>>>> } else {
>>>> /* Make sure all specified CPUs are online */
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < perf_cpu_map__nr(event_cpus); i++) {
>>>> - struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
>>>> + struct perf_cpu cpu;
>>>>
>>>> - if (perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) &&
>>>> - !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
>>>> + perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, i, event_cpus) {
>>>> + if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
>>>> index 51ccbfd3d246..0b52e67edb3b 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
>>>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> * In the case of per-cpu mmaps, sample CPU for AUX event;
>>>> * also enable the timestamp tracing for samples correlation.
>>>> */
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus)) {
>>>> + if (!perf_cpu_map__is_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus)) {
>>>> evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, CPU);
>>>> evsel__set_config_if_unset(arm_spe_pmu, arm_spe_evsel,
>>>> "ts_enable", 1);
>>>> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>> tracking_evsel->core.attr.sample_period = 1;
>>>>
>>>> /* In per-cpu case, always need the time of mmap events etc */
>>>> - if (!perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus)) {
>>>> + if (!perf_cpu_map__is_any_cpu_or_is_empty(cpus)) {
>>>> evsel__set_sample_bit(tracking_evsel, TIME);
>>>> evsel__set_sample_bit(tracking_evsel, CPU);
>>>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list