[PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Mon Dec 30 09:09:38 PST 2024


On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:21:38 +0000,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> On Mon, 2024-12-30 at 14:28 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > 
> > Two problems here:
> > 
> > - there is no "From Tomas Krcka <krckatom at amazon.de>" at the beginning
> >   of the patch, which is needed since you are posting from a gmail.com
> >   address
> > 
> > - there is no SoB using your gmail.com address, which is needed since
> >   this patch appears to be from your Amazon doppelganger.
> 
> The latter isn't needed if you have the former, surely?

I don't see why we shouldn't have it. AFAIC, this is a different
sender, and I'm pretty sure tglx applies the same policy.

> I've lost count of the number of patches I've posted over the decades
> from my function non-corporate email address, just using a From: and
> Signed-off-by: in the body for my work address. We've always accepted
> that, and git-am does the right thing (discarding the actual From:
> address from the headers of the email).

Is that the royal 'We'?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list