[PATCH v6] i2c: imx: support DMA defer probing
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at kernel.org
Mon Dec 23 15:13:52 PST 2024
Hi Carlos,
...
> @@ -1802,6 +1803,18 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> goto clk_notifier_unregister;
>
> + /* As we can always fall back to PIO, let's ignore the error setting up DMA. */
> + ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + goto clk_notifier_unregister;
> + else if (ret == -ENODEV)
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Only use PIO mode\n");
> + else
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to setup DMA (%pe), only use PIO mode\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
My question here is not just about the use of dev_err vs
dev_err_probe, but why don't we exit the probe if we get an
error.
We should use PIO only in case of ENODEV, in all the other cases
I think we should just leave. E.g. why don't we exit if we meet
ret == -ENOMEM?
Andi
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list