[PATCH 4/5] clk: Add flag to prevent frequency changes when walking subtrees
Miquel Raynal
miquel.raynal at bootlin.com
Mon Dec 23 10:43:13 PST 2024
Hi Maxime,
On 17/12/2024 at 13:47:53 +01, Maxime Ripard <mripard at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 06:41:14PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> There are mainly two ways to change a clock frequency.
>
> There's much more than that :)
"mainly"
Or maybe I should have added "on purpose".
>
> Off the top of my head, setting/clearing a min/max rate and changing the
> parent might also result in a rate change.
>
> And then, the firmware might get involved too.
>
>> The active way requires calling ->set_rate() in order to ask "on
>> purpose" for a frequency change. Otherwise, a clock can passively see
>> its frequency being updated depending on upstream clock frequency
>> changes. In most cases it is fine to just accept the new upstream
>> frequency - which by definition will have an impact on downstream
>> frequencies if we do not recalculate internal divisors. But there are
>> cases where, upon an upstream frequency change, we would like to
>> maintain a specific rate.
>
> Why is clk_set_rate_exclusive not enough?
I am trying to protect these rate changes from subtree walks, I don't
see where setting an exclusive rate would have an effect? But I might be
overlooking something, definitely.
...
>> @@ -2272,7 +2271,13 @@ static void clk_calc_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
>> {
>> struct clk_core *child;
>>
>> - core->new_rate = clk_recalc(core, core->parent->new_rate);
>> + if (core->flags & CLK_NO_RATE_CHANGE_DURING_PROPAGATION) {
>> + core->new_rate = clk_determine(core, core->rate);
>> + if (!core->new_rate)
>> + core->new_rate = clk_recalc(core, core->parent->new_rate);
>> + } else {
>> + core->new_rate = clk_recalc(core, core->parent->new_rate);
>> + }
>
> Sorry, it's not clear to me how it works. How will the parent clocks
> will get notified to adjust their dividers in that scenario? Also, what
> if they can't?
The idea is: if the flag is set, instead of accepting the new upstream
rate and recalculate the downstream rate based on a previously set
divider value, we change our divider value to match the same frequency
as before. But if we cannot, then we just keep the old way.
Cheers,
Miquèl
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list