[PATCH net-next v5 2/9] net: sparx5: add function for RGMII port check
Daniel Machon
daniel.machon at microchip.com
Fri Dec 20 05:48:41 PST 2024
The lan969x device contains two RGMII port interfaces, sitting at port
28 and 29. Add function: is_port_rgmii() to the match data ops, that
checks if a given port is an RGMII port or not. For Sparx5, this
function always returns false.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund at microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko at sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon at microchip.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.c | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.h | 5 +++++
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h | 5 +++++
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.c
index c2afa2176b08..76f0c8635eb9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.c
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static const struct sparx5_ops lan969x_ops = {
.is_port_5g = &lan969x_port_is_5g,
.is_port_10g = &lan969x_port_is_10g,
.is_port_25g = &lan969x_port_is_25g,
+ .is_port_rgmii = &lan969x_port_is_rgmii,
.get_port_dev_index = &lan969x_port_dev_mapping,
.get_port_dev_bit = &lan969x_get_dev_mode_bit,
.get_hsch_max_group_rate = &lan969x_get_hsch_max_group_rate,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.h
index 2489d0d32dfd..4b91c47d6d21 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/lan969x/lan969x.h
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ static inline bool lan969x_port_is_25g(int portno)
return false;
}
+static inline bool lan969x_port_is_rgmii(int portno)
+{
+ return portno == 28 || portno == 29;
+}
+
/* lan969x_calendar.c */
int lan969x_dsm_calendar_calc(struct sparx5 *sparx5, u32 taxi,
struct sparx5_calendar_data *data);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
index f61aa15beab7..4be717ba7d37 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
@@ -1072,6 +1072,7 @@ static const struct sparx5_ops sparx5_ops = {
.is_port_5g = &sparx5_port_is_5g,
.is_port_10g = &sparx5_port_is_10g,
.is_port_25g = &sparx5_port_is_25g,
+ .is_port_rgmii = &sparx5_port_is_rgmii,
.get_port_dev_index = &sparx5_port_dev_mapping,
.get_port_dev_bit = &sparx5_port_dev_mapping,
.get_hsch_max_group_rate = &sparx5_get_hsch_max_group_rate,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h
index d5dd953b0a71..c58d7841638e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ struct sparx5_ops {
bool (*is_port_5g)(int portno);
bool (*is_port_10g)(int portno);
bool (*is_port_25g)(int portno);
+ bool (*is_port_rgmii)(int portno);
u32 (*get_port_dev_index)(struct sparx5 *sparx5, int port);
u32 (*get_port_dev_bit)(struct sparx5 *sparx5, int port);
u32 (*get_hsch_max_group_rate)(int grp);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h
index 9b9bcc6834bc..c8a37468a3d1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ static inline bool sparx5_port_is_25g(int portno)
return portno >= 56 && portno <= 63;
}
+static inline bool sparx5_port_is_rgmii(int portno)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline u32 sparx5_to_high_dev(struct sparx5 *sparx5, int port)
{
const struct sparx5_ops *ops = sparx5->data->ops;
--
2.34.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list