[PATCH v5] i2c: imx: support DMA defer probing

[Carlos Song]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel at pengutronix.de>
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 2:13 PM
> To: Carlos Song <carlos.song at nxp.com>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at kernel.org>; Frank Li <frank.li at nxp.com>;
> kernel at pengutronix.de; shawnguo at kernel.org; s.hauer at pengutronix.de;
> festevam at gmail.com; linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org; imx at lists.linux.dev;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Clark Wang
> <xiaoning.wang at nxp.com>; Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: imx: support DMA defer probing
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this
> email' button
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 05:59:38AM +0000, Carlos Song wrote:
> > > > So we make this logic. Anyway we let the I2C controller registered
> > > > whether
> > > DMA is available or not(except defer probe).
> > > > Ignoring ENODEV and EPROBE_DEFER makes it looks like nothing
> > > > happened if
> > > DMA is defer probed or not enabled(This is an expected).
> > > > However we still need i2c DMA status is known when meet an
> > > > unexpected
> > > error, so we use dev_err_probe() to print error.
> > >
> > > Why dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err()?
> > >
> > Hi,
> > In patch V2 discussion, Marc suggested just return dev_err_probe(),
> > but I don't accept it so I choose to use dev_err_probe() to print error in V3.[1]
> In this case, the two APIs have the same function, do you mean dev_err() is more
> suitable?
>
> Yes, dev_err_probe() should be used in combination with return. For
> example:
>   return dev_err_probe(...);
>
> It will pass the return value on exit of the function and optionally print of the
> error message if it is not EPROBE_DEFER. Practically it replace commonly used
> coding pattern:
>   if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>     return ret;
>   } else if (ret) {
>     dev_err(..);
>     return ret;
>   }
>
Hi,

Get your good point. I will change my code in V6:
+       ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr);
+       if (ret) {
+               if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+                       goto clk_notifier_unregister;
+               else if (ret == -ENODEV)
+                       dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Only use PIO mode\n");
+               else
+                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to setup DMA, only use PIO mode\n");
+       }

I think this is what you want to see, right?

> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |
> |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21                       |
> http://www.pen/
> gutronix.de%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ccarlos.song%40nxp.com%7C2950266755a
> 241c00a9208dd20bd5cf2%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0
> %7C638702719862691439%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki
> OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ
> %3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=aIuzJP0v5C6HzOCGnCHobK9Llml3thHclTwu
> CjD13IM%3D&reserved=0  |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
> |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:
> +49-5121-206917-5555 |