[PATCH v1] i2c: imx: fix missing stop condition in single-master mode

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Stefan,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 04:16:40PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger at toradex.com>
> 
> A regression was introduced with the implementation of single-master
> mode, preventing proper stop conditions from being generated. Devices
> that require a valid stop condition, such as EEPROMs, fail to function
> correctly as a result.
> 
> The issue only affects devices with the single-master property enabled.
> 
> This commit resolves the issue by re-enabling I2C bus busy bit (IBB)
> polling for single-master mode when generating a stop condition. The fix
> further ensures that the i2c_imx->stopped flag is cleared at the start
> of each transfer, allowing the stop condition to be correctly generated
> in i2c_imx_stop().
> 
> According to the reference manual (IMX8MMRM, Rev. 2, 09/2019, page
> 5270), polling the IBB bit to determine if the bus is free is only
> necessary in multi-master mode. Consequently, the IBB bit is not polled
> for the start condition in single-master mode.
> 
> Fixes: 6692694aca86 ("i2c: imx: do not poll for bus busy in single master mode")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger at toradex.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index f751d231ded8..cbf66a69e20b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -534,20 +534,18 @@ static int i2c_imx_bus_busy(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, int for_busy, bool a
>  {
>  	unsigned long orig_jiffies = jiffies;
>  	unsigned int temp;
> -
> -	if (!i2c_imx->multi_master)
> -		return 0;
> +	bool multi_master = i2c_imx->multi_master;

with this small adjustment, I have applied your patch to 
i2c/i2c-host-fixes.

The idea behind the change is that variables are sorted by 
length, forming a kind of reversed Christmas tree shape. It's 
not a strict rule—some communities enforce it, others don't, and 
some follow entirely different conventions.

Since it feels somewhat arbitrary to me, I don't enforce it 
strictly. However, I personally try to adhere to the reversed 
Christmas tree rule whenever possible.

Andi

>  
>  	while (1) {
>  		temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
>  
>  		/* check for arbitration lost */
> -		if (temp & I2SR_IAL) {
> +		if (multi_master && (temp & I2SR_IAL)) {
>  			i2c_imx_clear_irq(i2c_imx, I2SR_IAL);
>  			return -EAGAIN;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (for_busy && (temp & I2SR_IBB)) {
> +		if (for_busy && (!multi_master || (temp & I2SR_IBB))) {
>  			i2c_imx->stopped = 0;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
>