[PATCH v4 19/25] proc/task_mmu: Ignore ZONE_DEVICE pages
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Tue Dec 17 14:31:25 PST 2024
On 17.12.24 06:13, Alistair Popple wrote:
> The procfs mmu files such as smaps currently ignore device dax and fs
> dax pages because these pages are considered special. To maintain
> existing behaviour once these pages are treated as normal pages and
> returned from vm_normal_page() add tests to explicitly skip them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple at nvidia.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 38a5a3e..c9b227a 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -801,6 +801,8 @@ static void smaps_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
>
> if (pte_present(ptent)) {
> page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> + if (page && (is_device_dax_page(page) || is_fsdax_page(page)))
This "is_device_dax_page(page) || is_fsdax_page(page)" is a common theme
here, likely we should have a special helper?
But, don't we actually want to include them in the smaps output now? I
think we want.
The rmap code will indicate these pages in /proc/meminfo, per-node info,
in the memcg ... as "Mapped:" etc.
So likely we just want to also indicate them here, or is there any
downsides we know of?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list